Hello
I've found the following difference of behavior between OCaml 3.10 and
3.11. The code below
<:expr<
do {
let a = "foo" in
print_endline a;
print_endline a
}
>>
when run through camlp4o becomes, in 3.10,
let a = "foo" in (print_endline a; print_endline a)
w
(So that's how you say "tail-recursive" in French...)
Xavier Leroy wrote in article
<49cb9854.1020...@inria.fr> in gmane.comp.lang.caml.inria:
> A technique that always works is to convert your function to
> continuation-passing style. The resulting code is hard to read and
> not particularly e
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 22:15 -0400, Peng Zang wrote:
> Are you using OCaml 3.10? I recall there's a bug that doesn't let you #use
> more than once due to bad file descriptors. It's been fixed in 3.11
That was it. Thanks!
Andre
___
Caml-list mailing l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Are you using OCaml 3.10? I recall there's a bug that doesn't let you #use
more than once due to bad file descriptors. It's been fixed in 3.11
Peng
On Thursday 26 March 2009 09:59:20 pm Andre Nathan wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have the simple program bel
Hello
I have the simple program below:
let () =
Sys.interactive := false;
Toploop.initialize_toplevel_env ();
for i = 1 to (Array.length Sys.argv) - 1 do
ignore (Toploop.use_file Format.std_formatter Sys.argv.(0))
done
which works fine when compiled with
$ ocamlc -o a
Thanks for the replies. sprintf2 is just fine for me.
Tiphaine
Jérémie Dimino a écrit :
> Tiphaine Turpin wrote:
>
>> has type string. But %a breaks this rule. Wouldn't it be simpler to have
>> two separate directives which accept respectively string printers and
>> channel printers, regardle
Tiphaine Turpin wrote:
> has type string. But %a breaks this rule. Wouldn't it be simpler to have
> two separate directives which accept respectively string printers and
> channel printers, regardless of the outer printing function ?
Note that you can do it with batteries and the new printf.
The
Yeah, the behaviour of *printf is weird in this respect (and that of
Extlib's printf is even a tad worse). For this reason, in Batteries
Included, we have
Printf.sprintf (which behaves as the base Printf.sprintf)
and
Printf.sprintf2 (which behaves as you expected)
All of this in addition to ou
Hi,
I'am confused by the interpretation of "%a":
# Printf.printf "%a";;
- : (out_channel -> '_a -> unit) -> '_a -> unit =
# Printf.sprintf "%a";;
- : (unit -> '_a -> string) -> '_a -> string =
Usually, the typing of formatting functions is such that
printf something
has type unit if and only
Je voudrais savoir s'il existait un moyen de transformer une fonction
récursive non terminale en fonction récursive terminale avec Caml.
[ Translation: is there a way to transform a non-tail-recursive function
into a tail-recursive function? ]
A technique that always works is to convert you
Bonjour,
Je voudrais savoir s'il existait un moyen de transformer une
fonction récursive non terminale en fonction récursive terminale avec
Caml.
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:00:18PM +, Joel Reymont wrote:
> Are there OCaml bindings for QT?
>
> Would OCaml + QT be a good option for a Windows app?
What's wrong with Gtk for this? It now supports native Mac widgets
via: http://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/OSX
We also have a very thorough set of
Call for papers: Towards a Digital Mathematics Library (DML 2009)
July 8-9th, 2009, Ontario, CA c/o CICM 2009
Workshop webpage:
http://www.fi.muni.cz/~sojka/dml-2009.html
Deadlines: April 29th: abstract submissions
May 4th: paper submissions
May 22nd: paper acceptance/reje
13 matches
Mail list logo
