On 03-12-2009, ri...@happyleptic.org wrote:
>> > (1) A network of redundant mirrors which means you can always get the
>> > tarball you need, even when the original site is down:
>
> If I understand correctly, GODI site does not store any of the source
> tarballs, but the makefiles download the so
> > (1) A network of redundant mirrors which means you can always get the
> > tarball you need, even when the original site is down:
If I understand correctly, GODI site does not store any of the source
tarballs, but the makefiles download the sources directly from their
respective home, does it ?
Am Donnerstag, den 03.12.2009, 18:00 + schrieb Richard Jones:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 05:51:00PM +0100, ri...@happyleptic.org wrote:
> > > Not really .. I have been meaning for several years to implement
> > > something like *CPAN* for OCaml. CPAN is much more than what people
> > > here s
Am Donnerstag, den 03.12.2009, 18:45 + schrieb Matthias Görgens:
> > This might be what you're looking for:
> > http://docs.camlcity.org/docs/index.html
>
> Thanks. I'll try it. Does it support e.g. searching for "(a->b) ->
> [a] -> [b]" and spitting out List.map?
There is no search for ty
> This might be what you're looking for:
> http://docs.camlcity.org/docs/index.html
Thanks. I'll try it. Does it support e.g. searching for "(a->b) ->
[a] -> [b]" and spitting out List.map?
Matthias.
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription managemen
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 05:51:00PM +0100, ri...@happyleptic.org wrote:
> > Not really .. I have been meaning for several years to implement
> > something like *CPAN* for OCaml. CPAN is much more than what people
> > here seem to think it is.
>
> Out of curiosity, what's in CPAN that's not in GOD
> Not really .. I have been meaning for several years to implement
> something like *CPAN* for OCaml. CPAN is much more than what people
> here seem to think it is.
Out of curiosity, what's in CPAN that's not in GODI ?
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subs
Le Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:01:18 +0100, Damien Doligez
a écrit:
On 2009-12-03, at 12:00, AUGER wrote:
(* preliminary function: negate_minus_1 : int -> int : n |-> -n-1 *)
let negate_minus_1 = (lor) (-(max_int/2)-1) (* or inline the constant *)
You probably mean this:
let negate_minus_1
This might be what you're looking for:
http://docs.camlcity.org/docs/index.html
You can search through the files in all of the GODI packages. It's not
just function names and type signatures so you might get more results
than you want.
Tom
On Dec 3, 2009, at 5:08 PM, Matthias Görgens wrot
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 04:08:08PM +, Matthias Görgens wrote:
> Is there an equivalent to Haskell's Hoogle for Ocaml?
Not really .. I have been meaning for several years to implement
something like *CPAN* for OCaml. CPAN is much more than what people
here seem to think it is.
Rich.
--
Ric
Hi,
Is there an equivalent to Haskell's Hoogle for Ocaml?
Matthias.
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/gr
On 2009-12-03, at 12:00, AUGER wrote:
(* preliminary function: negate_minus_1 : int -> int : n |-> -n-1 *)
let negate_minus_1 = (lor) (-(max_int/2)-1) (* or inline the
constant *)
You probably mean this:
let negate_minus_1 = (lxor) (-1);;
-- Damien
Le Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:48:37 +0100, Daniel Bünzli
a écrit:
Hello Cedric,
Thanks for your comments. Comments on your comments.
let rint () = (Random.bits () lsl 1) lxor (Random.bits ());;
That was actually my first version. However I dropped it because I
thought that generating a new rand
Hello Cedric,
Thanks for your comments. Comments on your comments.
> let rint () = (Random.bits () lsl 1) lxor (Random.bits ());;
That was actually my first version. However I dropped it because I
thought that generating a new random number by the interaction of the
bits of two successive PRN co
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 11:56:59AM +0100, Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
> Reading up on this, I don't think using -fPIC on amd64 has a performance
> penalty since it has the %rip register. Also it appears that gcc by default
> uses indirect addressing via %rip in the generated asm.
I duly notice t
Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
Reading up on this, I don't think using -fPIC on amd64 has a performance
penalty since it has the %rip register. Also it appears that gcc by default
uses indirect addressing via %rip in the generated asm.
I did some benchmarks when switching the ocamlopt AMD64 code
Le Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:59:08 +0100, Daniel Bünzli
a écrit:
I know little about PRGN and unfortunately in a lot of cases the
functions in the Random module don't provide me the right
interface. Could anybody tell me if the following functions preserve
the quality of the underlying PRGN and/or
On Wednesday 02 December 2009 23:37:51 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 04:51:16PM +, Richard Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 01:33:11PM +0100, Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
> > > I think compiling with -fPIC by default on the amd64/x86_64 arch
> > > would be a good st
18 matches
Mail list logo
