[Caml-list] Extending Set - strange behavior of abstract type

I tried to extend the standard Set module with new operations. I got error messages about type incompatibilities (the Set.S.t as exposed by my implementation and Set.S.t used by functions from the original Set). I have reduced my code to the following small example: module Set = struct modul

Re: [Caml-list] Extending Set - strange behavior of abstract type

Dawid Toton wrote: > I tried to extend the standard Set module with new operations. I got > error messages about type incompatibilities (the Set.S.t as exposed by > my implementation and Set.S.t used by functions from the original Set). > I have reduced my code to the following small example: > >

[Caml-list] overbld (ocaml+libraries under mingw) - binary release

Hello. I've finally resolved the 'license' question that was worrying me for a long time because of my stupidity, and now we are ready to present windows binary installer of OCaml/MinGW + libraries. Moreover, there are _two_ installers. They share in common the following features: - OCaml+l

[Caml-list] Re: Extending Set - strange behavior of abstract type

On 27-04-2010, Dawid Toton wrote: > I tried to extend the standard Set module with new operations. I got > error messages about type incompatibilities (the Set.S.t as exposed by > my implementation and Set.S.t used by functions from the original Set). > I have reduced my code to the following s