Hello,
are there mbox-Libraries around?
If not: a while ago I wrote something that
was meant as a library for reading mbox-files.
But I have not worked on that code for a long time.
I did just some matching with ocamllex to split the mails,
and then worked on strings.
The stuff needs to be
On 11-05-2010, oli...@first.in-berlin.de oli...@first.in-berlin.de wrote:
Hello,
are there mbox-Libraries around?
You can have a look at:
https://forge.ocamlcore.org/scm/viewvc.php/trunk/mbox.ml?view=markuprevision=11root=spamoracle
There are other files in the repository that can maybe
A little off topic, but how is Mono/Unix these days?
Still leaks memory,
you refer to your examinations?
(http://flyingfrogblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/mono-22-still-leaks-memory.html?showComment=1233522107493#c7872630239059031867)
where you say yes and the mono devs are say no to memory leaking?
Hello Séphane,
2010/4/30 David MENTRE dmen...@linux-france.org:
2010/4/30 Stéphane Glondu st...@glondu.net:
David MENTRE a écrit :
I also used Cryptokit once. It was pretty useful and easy to use.
However I had to modify a few lines in it in order to allow me to do
some compositions with
Hi,
However, random numbers are tricky, and I'm suspicious of just
adding a new operation ad hoc when I don't understand how the
underlying PRNG works. Hence, I'd appreciate if anyone could
offer some insight on whether the above approach has any hidden
pitfalls (i.e. some sort of regularity
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Peng Zang peng.z...@gmail.com wrote:
And of course as you pointed out you can always compile OCaml code to native
machine code which has always had good performance.
i was under the impression the main complaint is lack of top-notch
support for concurrency?
1. - programming in a ML like language ( especially the caml family
since I really like those lightweigt type definitions and the pattern
matching that can be applied on those)
2. - high performance runtime, preferably a jit based vm, no problems with TCO
3. - a true open source license
I'm curious whether there are any notes / pointers regarding the completeness
of the ocaml-java implementation (couldn't find this on the web site). I'm
wondering about the feasibility of using it for a moderately large ocaml
project I've been working on which uses Lwt to perform async I/O. I
[Apologies for cross-postings.]
--
CALCULEMUS 2010 - Deadline Extension for Emerging Trends
--
17th Symposium on the Integration of
Symbolic Computation and Mechanised Reasoning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ah, I guess I think of ocamlrun as just an interpreter. But you're right,
that's also a vm.
Peng
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 07:47:25 pm ben kuin wrote:
OCaml doesn't have a vm like the jvm.
ocamlc compiles to bytecode
ocamlrun interprets the
10 matches
Mail list logo
