Re: [Caml-list] picking / marshaling to strings in ocaml-revision-stable way

2008-05-31 Thread Berke Durak
understand. -- Berke Durak ___ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http

Re: [Caml-list] picking / marshaling to strings in ocaml-revision-stable way

2008-05-31 Thread Berke Durak
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Robert Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How far is the reach from the Jane St S-exp library from producing JSON? I've not actually looked at it, but that'd be super nifty in the interoperation world. If you just want JSON syntax, you can use Sexplib to

Re: [Caml-list] Re: Where's my non-classical shared memory concurrency technology?

2008-05-19 Thread Berke Durak
and implement a usable type or other system for making concurrency and parallelism safe? If the answer is STM, please show me some non-trivial application that uses it, preferably in an impure language. -- Berke Durak ___ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription

[Caml-list] Where's my non-classical shared memory concurrency technology?

2008-05-18 Thread Berke Durak
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Jon Harrop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Avoiding threads does not improve the safety of the language, it simply degrades the capabilities of the language. Avoiding threads is like avoiding malloc() in a C program and doing only static and stack allocation: it is

Re: [Caml-list] Re: Why OCaml sucks

2008-05-13 Thread Berke Durak
as a lowercase letter. -- Berke DURAK ___ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports

Re: [Caml-list] Re: Why OCaml rocks

2008-05-10 Thread Berke Durak
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 01:01:03AM +0200, Berke Durak wrote: But you are saying in the README that values in the ancient heap have some limitations, namely no ad-hoc polymorphic primitives. You misunderstand

[Caml-list] Re: Ancient, concurrency, etc.

2008-05-10 Thread Berke Durak
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As you cannot mutate anything that is ancient (since it might be concurrently accessed), There are various restrictions on mutating the ancient data, which are explained in the README. It is not true that ancient

[Caml-list] ExtLib/Camomile UTF8

2008-05-05 Thread Berke Durak
at forge.ocamlcore.org... Attached is the diff against ExtLib 1.5. -- Berke Durak extlib-patch Description: Binary data ___ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's

Re: [Caml-list] Core has landed

2008-05-03 Thread Berke Durak
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 11:14:12AM +0200, Berke Durak wrote: On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In any case, why don't you just use Camomile? I needed UTF and I was already using