Re: [Caml-list] Haskell vs OCaml

2008-08-13 Thread David Thomas
--- On Wed, 8/13/08, Jon Harrop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I consider them all to be untested because nobody has ever done anything > significant using Haskell AFAIK. Besides the window manager I'm currently using... :-P ___ Caml-list m

Re: [Caml-list] [announce] O'Browser : OCaml on browsers

2008-11-18 Thread David Thomas
I'd like to see a plugin that makes available to JS a function to execute ocaml bytecode. There could be a standard way to check for support, and the pure javascript interpreter could be loaded if it is missing (for those browsers/computers on which performance is reasonable). --- On Tue, 11

Re: [Caml-list] Computing with big numbers?

2008-12-04 Thread David Thomas
That depends on the threat model. If the question is, "presuming no active attack, how likely is it to break?", then the cryptanalytic results against the hash are irrelevant. If the question is "how secure is it if someone is maliciously manipulating files", then they are certainly relevant.