On the same topic, I was wondering why the type of the ampl_scalar_app
function below was displayed as ('a - 'a - float) - 'a - 'a - float
rather than ('a - 'a - float) - 'a - ('a - float). The latter would
make my life easier.
# let ampl_scalar_app f p = if f p p 1. then fun x-f x p else fun
of - and the left-associativity of
application.
Think your code more semantically and less syntactically.
In the end this type sytem makes you a better programmer.
- *damien*
--
*En réponse au message*
*de :* Gilles Pirio
*du :* 2009-10-11 21:57:40
*À :* caml-list
Yes - I'd agree OCaml is getting more traction these days! Looking forward
to it in the commercial field :)
Also, I'm starting to see more openings in my field where FP is a
requirements. See for instance for OCaml:
.
Cheers
Gilles
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Sylvain Le Gall sylv...@le-gall.net wrote:
On 09-12-2008, Gilles Pirio gilles.pi...@gmail.com wrote:
To my mind, the best way is to provide a patch through the bug tracking
system of INRIA. This is highly probable that INRIA team doesn't accept
I have the need to do that
(e.g. when
I get the above info and actually start the work).
Cheers
G
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Sylvain Le Gall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On 06-12-2008, Gilles Pirio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(2) Any way to contribute this work back to Ocaml
NOTE: sorry for double posting but I've been informed that my initial post
(in google group - I usually read the group from there) would not be
forwarded to the caml list as I naively thought...
---
Hi all
I've been busy changing/implementing (new) passes in ocamlopt back-end
for my
