OCaml compiled by F# called by C#?
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Thomas Gazagnaire
thomas.gazagna...@inria.fr wrote:
Hi Vincent!
you can try camloo [1] which compiles (old-syntax) caml-light to bigloo,
which is a scheme to C compiler. I reckon it would be quite easy to
update it to parse
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:18 AM, David MENTRE dmen...@linux-france.org wrote:
Sylvain, your OASIS project and the generated web page is very
interesting in that regard.
OASIS looks *very* nice.
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Jon Harrop j...@ffconsultancy.com wrote:
On Tuesday 16 February 2010 16:47:03 Grant Rettke wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Ashish Agarwal agarwal1...@gmail.com
wrote:
let rec
Do OCaml'er look at let rec more as being a message to the programmer
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Andrej Bauer andrej.ba...@andrej.com wrote:
Moreover, the burden of rec is tiny so I don't think it is worth
discussing in such detail.
Ah, but you are forgetting Wadler's Law.
You mean this:
Wadler's Law:
The emotional intensity of debate on a
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Eray Ozkural examach...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:46 PM, David Baelde david.bae...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christophe TROESTLER
christophe.troestler+oc...@umh.ac.be wrote:
COULD PEOPLE WHO FIND THE DEFAULT USEFUL
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Ashish Agarwal agarwal1...@gmail.com wrote:
let rec
Do OCaml'er look at let rec more as being a message to the programmer,
rather than the compiler, that the way I want to define this function
is recursively so even if 'f' was previously bound you know which one
Hi,
What is your favorite editor for hacking with OCaml?
Your favorite is key here here; I appreciate you human input as I
can use a search engine to find any old OCaml editor easily.
Best wishes,
Grant
--
http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/
___
