On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Sylvain Le Gall sylv...@le-gall.net wrote:
Could OCamlForge be set up to do one-click read-only mirroring of
interesting github projects?
That is a possible project:
https://forge.ocamlcore.org/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=604group_id=1atid=102
The main
Hi Sylvain, Xavier,
I have encountered what seems to be a serious problem with
reduce_int_array in ocamlmpi, namely, in a trivial test case it
successfully returns incorrect results. This is my test code
--
(* ocamlopt -o test -I +ocamlmpi mpi.cmxa test.ml *)
let me = Mpi.comm_rank
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Xavier Leroy xavier.le...@inria.fr wrote:
- The register-based SSE2 model fits the OCaml back-end much better
than the stack-based x87 model. In particular, let-bound intermediate
results of type float can be kept in SSE2 registers, while in
the current
I use NEdit with the syntax highlighting patterns available from
n8gray.org. A bonus is that for some reason this works perfectly with
ocaml+twt with no changes.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
Hi,
What is your favorite editor for hacking with OCaml?
Your
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Jon Harrop j...@ffconsultancy.com wrote:
Sure but it is worth remembering that distributed parallelism across clusters
is a tiny niche compared to multicores.
I think the balance is slightly different than this in
scientific/research computing (the original
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org wrote:
So, the real question is: is OC4MC going to be ported to mainline OCaml
and support in the future or not?
Recalling how mainline had us waiting like 5 years for native exception
backtraces, and then another like 3
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Andreas Rossbergrossb...@mpi-sws.org wrote:
I know. (Haskell has nested comments, too, btw.) That does not make a
difference, though - it is all handled by lex already. In fact, my code
handled nested comments just fine.
OK, now I'm curious :) how does your
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Andreas Rossbergrossb...@mpi-sws.org wrote:
On Jun 30, 2009, at 22.19 h, Mike Lin wrote:
More generally, you've got parentheses, comments, and string literals,
and you need to know to ignore whitespace within any of those -- and
to ignore e.g. an open
There is certainly a reasonable body of basic CS research on
parallelizing CFG algorithms such as CYK, the Earley parser, and to a
lesser extent the more practical LALR strategy used by yacc etc. (In
the latter case it seems to get easier if you're willing to trade off
determinism when parsing
This might be of interest to anyone else in the Boston area.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Anne Hunter an...@eecs.mit.edu
Date: Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:40 PM
Subject: User Group for functional programmers and scientific
computing; Monday, April 6th
To: jobsl...@altoids.mit.edu
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Markus Mottl markus.mo...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/3/16 Yaron Minsky ymin...@gmail.com:
I would humbly propose that this thread has now gotten deeply off-topic,
and
perhaps discussion on the list should turn back to programming languages,
rather than to deep
2009/3/14 Yaron Minsky ymin...@gmail.com
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Yoann Padioleau pada...@wanadoo.frwrote:
Having said that, about your company, Jane Street,
aren't you part of the people that put the countries in such trouble ?
Do you create wealth ? It seems you are just a
might conclude that Tim's letter
to your lawyer may have been written in implied confidence, and if that was
the case then an outside observer might find it somewhat distasteful to post
it like this. Could your perhaps clarify the circumstances of that, as well?
Mike Lin
thought you might appreciate another data point. I have no idea
where the turnover is between 4x4 and 61x61 :).
Will
2009/2/20 Mike Lin nile...@gmail.com:
Erick, we should compare notes sometime. I have a lot of code for doing
this
kind of stuff (I am working on empirical codon models
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Jon Harrop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps the parallel GC could enable support for things like OpenMP but I
personally would rather see a shift to similar functionality to that of
Microsoft's TPL because (I assume) it is better for parallel tree
operations
15 matches
Mail list logo
