Re: [Caml-list] What's the purpose of the static library?

Thanks for the help. Another question, It seems *.cma *.cmxa *.a are all native code libraries, why are there so many suffix? Is there any difference between cma, cmxa and a? Alain Frisch 已写入: bill yan wrote: By my understanding, unlike dlllibrary.so and liblibrary.a give user an option

Re: [Caml-list] What's the purpose of the static library?

Sorry, I just noticed Richard already answered my question in previous email. So Please ignore my previous email. Thanks. bill yan 已写入: Thanks for the help. Another question, It seems *.cma *.cmxa *.a are all native code libraries, why are there so many suffix? Is there any difference

Re: [Caml-list] What's the purpose of the static library?

Best regards, Bill Richard Jones ???: On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 05:09:58PM +0800, bill yan wrote: Thanks a lot for your information. And we'd like to know more about the OCaml library architectures, like on what situation dynamic libraries are used, and when static libraries are used, and so

Re: [Caml-list] What's the purpose of the static library?

on this topic. Regards, Bill Stéphane Glondu 已写入: bill yan a écrit : I noticed there are some static libraries(.a) installed with ocaml, for example, /usr/lib/ocaml/bigarray.a. What's the purpose of those static libraries? Thanks a lot. They contain (natively) compiled OCaml code. An OCaml library

[Caml-list] What's the purpose of the static library?

Hi, I noticed there are some static libraries(.a) installed with ocaml, for example, /usr/lib/ocaml/bigarray.a. What's the purpose of those static libraries? Thanks a lot. Regards, Bill ___ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:

[Caml-list] Ocaml and lablgtk interface committed or not?

Hi, Just a general question, Are Ocaml and lablgtk interfaces committed? I mean whether Ocaml and lablgtk interfaces(command and library) always backward compatible? Thanks a lot. Regards, Bill ___ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: