On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Jon Harrop wrote:
> Sure but it is worth remembering that distributed parallelism across clusters
> is a tiny niche compared to multicores.
I think the balance is slightly different than this in
scientific/research computing (the original subject of this thread).
On Tuesday 22 December 2009 13:11:58 Eray Ozkural wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Linas Vepstas
wrote:
> > However, if you are interested in merely using the system
> > to do your "real" work, then writing message-passing code
> > is an utter waste of time -- its difficult, time-consum
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> However, let's not forget about the new GPU architectures, which are
> sort of hybrid. The newer GPUs will have more exotic on-chip
> interconnection networks.
Some more clarification, as the number of cores increase, you would
expect more of
> Have you ever tried writing a significant or complex algo using
> message passing? Its fun if you have nothing better to to --
> its a good intellectual challenge. You can even learn some
> interesting computer science while you do it.
>
> However, if you are interested in merely using the sy
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> However, if you are interested in merely using the system
> to do your "real" work, then writing message-passing code
> is an utter waste of time -- its difficult, time-consuming, error
> prone, hard to balance and optimize & tune, works wel
Hi Lukasz,
Yikes! Care to start an argument on my behalf?
2009/12/20 Lukasz Stafiniak :
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Dario Teixeira
> Date: Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 3:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: OCaml is broken
> To: Erik Rigtorp
> Cc: caml-list
>
>
> Hi,
>
>> It's
On Wednesday 25 November 2009 11:05:14 David MENTRE wrote:
> - Code snippets of OCaml used in scientific computing or simulation,
> typically for advocacy like "it takes 10 lines in OCaml to do this,
> you would use 50 lines in C++ to do the same thing";
You may find the examples from OCaml for S
> I'm considering doing a short presentation of OCaml to my colleagues
> in my research lab. They are working in the telecommunication and
> power electronic sectors, mainly doing signal processing and
> simulations. I know OCaml[1] but not specifically those domains.
>
> Therefore, I'm looking for
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:05 PM, David MENTRE wrote:
> - My colleagues are working a lot with Mathlab, is there any synergy
> there (bindings, ways to integrate Mathlab within OCaml code or vice
> versa, ...)?
See OcamlMex : http://ocamlmex.gforge.inria.fr/
When working with scientific softwar
Hello,
I'm considering doing a short presentation of OCaml to my colleagues
in my research lab. They are working in the telecommunication and
power electronic sectors, mainly doing signal processing and
simulations. I know OCaml[1] but not specifically those domains.
Therefore, I'm looking for re
10 matches
Mail list logo