* Erik Rigtorp:
However OCaml is broken! It does not provide any support for multicore
architectures, which by now is considered a bug!
The run-time library is sufficiently small so that you can run
multiple processes in parallel. They will even share the code and
constant data.
It doesn't
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 17:18, Gerd Stolpmann g...@gerd-stolpmann.de wrote:
As you mention order books and soft-realtime, I guess your main concern
are minimized latencies. Well, you need then a style of parallelism that
focuses on a certain processing path for a single data item, and where
Am Samstag, den 19.12.2009, 10:30 +0100 schrieb Erik Rigtorp:
Hi!
I've been using Erlang and C++ to build a soft real-time system. As
the project has evolved we've needed to write more and more of the
code in C++ in order to achieve our latency requirements. But C++ is
not as performant as
Hi!
I've been using Erlang and C++ to build a soft real-time system. As
the project has evolved we've needed to write more and more of the
code in C++ in order to achieve our latency requirements. But C++ is
not as performant as you might think until you start to write your own
allocators and
Erik Rigtorp a écrit :
However OCaml is broken! It does not provide any support for multicore
architectures, which by now is considered a bug! [...]
You might be interested by OCaml4Multicore:
http://www.algo-prog.info/ocmc/web/
It's still experimental, but its authors would love to have
