On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 01:08:17AM +, Jon Harrop wrote:
> > > You will be interested in the following important article:
> > > http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1411308
> > Is this freely available anywhere?
>
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 01:08:17AM +, Jon Harrop wrote:
> > You will be interested in the following important article:
> > http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1411308
> Is this freely available anywhere?
Seriously, you SPAM everybody here with periodical announces of
non-free issues of the
On Thursday 30 October 2008 18:48:26 CUOQ Pascal wrote:
> Warren Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to understand better how ocaml's weak pointers operate.
>
> You will be interested in the following important article:
> http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1411308
Is this freely avai
Alain Frisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Warren Harris wrote:
>> On Oct 30, 2008, at 11:48 AM, CUOQ Pascal - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> In short: don't use weak pointers to make caches.
>>
>> Thanks for the advice -- but I thought this was exactly what weak
>> hash tables were intended for.
>
Warren Harris wrote:
On Oct 30, 2008, at 11:48 AM, CUOQ Pascal - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In short: don't use weak pointers to make
caches.
Thanks for the advice -- but I thought this was exactly what weak hash
tables were intended for.
Although there is some similarity between a weak table
On Oct 30, 2008, at 11:48 AM, CUOQ Pascal - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Warren Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to understand better how ocaml's weak pointers operate.
You will be interested in the following important article:
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1411308
:)
Thank
Le 30 oct. 08 à 19:48, CUOQ Pascal a écrit :
First, although it doesn't seem to be specified in the documentation,
I assume that weak pointers will *not* be reclaimed (e.g. from a weak
hash table) if the program retains some other reference to the
object.
Exactly.
The documentation should
Warren Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to understand better how ocaml's weak pointers operate.
You will be interested in the following important article:
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1411308
:)
>First, although it doesn't seem to be specified in the documentation,
>I as
