On 07/02/2010 07:48 PM, Daniel Bünzli wrote:
I tried to add /usr/local/lib/ocaml to LD_LIBRARY_PATH but without
success. Any hint ? Is that a bug or am I missing something ?
As a side node , you should also always link the main program with
-linkall (to make sure all the modules that plugins m
> Could you double-check that you do not mix files compiled with different
> versions?
Yes, that's impossible it was on a clean system. Here's another error
I get in another example :
error loading shared library: ...: undefined symbol: caml_young_ptr
Is the whole runtime system missing to them
On 07/02/2010 07:48 PM, Daniel Bünzli wrote:
Now on Linux 2.6.32-23-generic #37-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 11 07:54:58 UTC
2010 i686 GNU/Linux
with exactly the same code that know works on osx and ocaml 3.12 from
svn. I get the following problem when running my test program.
error loading shared librar
Now on Linux 2.6.32-23-generic #37-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 11 07:54:58 UTC
2010 i686 GNU/Linux
with exactly the same code that know works on osx and ocaml 3.12 from
svn. I get the following problem when running my test program.
error loading shared library:
/home/dbuenzli/sync/dynlinkt/_build/a/a.cmxs
> Can you try it and see if it solves your problem under Mac OS ?
It does. Thanks for the fix. Btw. dynlink with first class modules is cool.
Best,
Daniel
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
On 07/02/2010 10:40 AM, Alain Frisch wrote:
I'll try to apply a fix.
I've committed a tentative fix (version/3.12 on the SVN repository). Can
you try it and see if it solves your problem under Mac OS ?
Alain
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscript
On 07/02/2010 10:27 AM, Daniel Bünzli wrote:
(Note: for dynlink, I believe that loading modules in private mode should be
safe.)
No, at least not in 3.12.0+beta1.
Ah yes, sorry, I did not ready your original post carefully enough.
I think the problem is that dlopen is called (in loadfile_pr
> (Note: for dynlink, I believe that loading modules in private mode should be
> safe.)
No, at least not in 3.12.0+beta1.
Daniel
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: ht
On 07/01/2010 09:16 PM, Daniel Bünzli wrote:
Well in fact this looks like dll bug since if the interface of M.test
doesn't match in a/m.cmx and b/m.cmx then a segfault occurs. Something
similar is reported here :
http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=4839
http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?i
> Is that expected behaviour ? That looks like dll hell.
Well in fact this looks like dll bug since if the interface of M.test
doesn't match in a/m.cmx and b/m.cmx then a segfault occurs. Something
similar is reported here :
http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=4839
http://caml.inria.fr/mantis
10 matches
Mail list logo
