[Caml-list] Re: Native toplevel? (was: OCamlJit 2.0)

2010-11-18 Thread Benedikt Meurer
On Nov 17, 2010, at 09:44 , Alain Frisch wrote: There is actually already a native top-level in the distribution, even though it is undocumented and unmaintained. You can build it with the make ocamlnat target. The implementation is based on the same approach as native dynlink. The

[Caml-list] Re: Native toplevel? (was: OCamlJit 2.0)

2010-11-17 Thread Satoshi Ogasawara
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2010/11/17, at 17:44, Alain Frisch wrote: Does performance really matter that much for rapid prototyping/development? I can imagine other uses of the toplevel where performance matters more, like theorem provers embedded in the OCaml

[Caml-list] Re: Native toplevel? (was: OCamlJit 2.0)

2010-11-17 Thread Sylvain Le Gall
On 17-11-2010, Alain Frisch al...@frisch.fr wrote: On 11/16/2010 03:52 PM, Benedikt Meurer wrote: OCamlJit 2.0 was specifically designed for desktop processors and is not really portable to anything else in its current shape, because the target audience are people using the interactive