RE: [Caml-list] free, open-source version of OCaml grammar?

2010-02-15 Thread David Allsopp
IANAL! Yitzhak Mendelbaum wrote: > I'd like to port the OCaml grammar to another parser generator. What *exactly* do you mean by port? A line-by-line conversion of parsing/parser.mly to a your new parser generator's syntax or a brand new file which exactly parses the same grammar as parsing/parse

Re: [Caml-list] free, open-source version of OCaml grammar?

2010-02-15 Thread Yitzhak Mandelbaum
Basil, I agree that my reading might well be too restrictive. Indeed, if anyone who understands these matters well can clarify, I'd appreciate it. Regarding the issue of syntax -- true in principle, but the fact of the matter is that I started with the yacc grammar, not the reference ma

Re: [Caml-list] free, open-source version of OCaml grammar?

2010-02-15 Thread Basile STARYNKEVITCH
Yitzhak Mandelbaum wrote: Hi, I'd like to port the OCaml grammar to another parser generator. However, the grammar is covered under the Q Public License, and the terms of the license seem to require that the ported version only be distributed as a patch to the current YACC grammar. Given that

[Caml-list] free, open-source version of OCaml grammar?

2010-02-15 Thread Yitzhak Mandelbaum
Hi, I'd like to port the OCaml grammar to another parser generator. However, the grammar is covered under the Q Public License, and the terms of the license seem to require that the ported version only be distributed as a patch to the current YACC grammar. Given that I'm porting the gramm