On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Alain Frisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You should really avoid linking two modules with the same name.
Yes, I agree vehemently :). I would like the bytecode linker to help
me out by (at least) warning me when I do it by accident.
Jake
_
Jake Donham wrote:
There is no trouble linking a module more than once, but different
parts of the code can wind up linked to different instances of the
module, leading to the confusing behavior that exception handling
seems not to work (and generally that things you think are equal are
not).
Y
Jake Donham wrote:
> [...]
> There is no trouble linking a module more than once, but different
> parts of the code can wind up linked to different instances of the
> module, leading to the confusing behavior that exception handling
> seems not to work (and generally that things you think are equal
Hi,
Consider the following code:
a.ml: let a () = raise (Unix.Unix_error (Unix.E2BIG, "", ""))
b.ml: try A.a () with Unix.Unix_error (_,_,_) -> ()
compiled with
ocamlc -o test unix.cma a.ml unix.cma b.ml
Run it:
> ./test
Fatal error: exception Unix.Unix_error(0, "", "")
With except
