Re: [Caml-list] quasiquoting: 3 parsers for camlp4 vs 1 for haskell?

2009-04-17 Thread Jake Donham
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Joel Reymont wrote: > Can someone shed light on how, where and why three different > parsers are required for camlp4? Is this still the case with 3.11? I haven't read the Mainland paper so I don't know exactly what he's talking about, but with the MetaGenerator m

Re: [Caml-list] quasiquoting: 3 parsers for camlp4 vs 1 for haskell?

2009-04-22 Thread Jon Harrop
On Friday 17 April 2009 19:24:31 Joel Reymont wrote: > From the quasiquoting paper by Geoffrey Mainland [1], page 7: > > "The major advantage of our approach over that of camlp4 > is that we demonstrate how to use generic programming > to reuse a single parser to parse quasiquoted patterns, > quas

Re: [Caml-list] quasiquoting: 3 parsers for camlp4 vs 1 for haskell?

2009-04-22 Thread Geoffrey Mainland
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:19:09AM +0100, Jon Harrop wrote: > On Friday 17 April 2009 19:24:31 Joel Reymont wrote: > > From the quasiquoting paper by Geoffrey Mainland [1], page 7: > > > > "The major advantage of our approach over that of camlp4 > > is that we demonstrate how to use generic progra

Re: [Caml-list] quasiquoting: 3 parsers for camlp4 vs 1 for haskell?

2009-04-23 Thread Nicolas Pouillard
Excerpts from Jon Harrop's message of Thu Apr 23 01:19:09 +0200 2009: > On Friday 17 April 2009 19:24:31 Joel Reymont wrote: > > From the quasiquoting paper by Geoffrey Mainland [1], page 7: > > > > "The major advantage of our approach over that of camlp4 > > is that we demonstrate how to use gene