I'll second that. I remember Ballmer's "Linux is a cancer..." and gave
an overview of the origins and rationale to students in a (shame - the
only Powerpoint) presentation I still use: http://www.slideshare.net/cubexplorer/opensource-5479951
- DaveE
thank you Mr. Stallman. Thank you Mr. To
I'm not surprised people have an opinion and are informed about these
things. I'm old enough to remember how Microsoft sucked the life out of the
desktop software industry due to their anti-competitive practises. They
were able to do this cuz they could keep their source code secret, it
enabled the
Perhaps this rich seam of knowledge could be captured in a little
Camping app: 'a guide to software licenses' :-)
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 10:35:45AM -0700, Trevor Johns wrote:
MIT is marginally simpler to read and is unambiguous, since there's
only
one version. For this reason, it's my pers
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 10:35:45AM -0700, Trevor Johns wrote:
> MIT is marginally simpler to read and is unambiguous, since there's only
> one version. For this reason, it's my personal favorite.
Heh. Actually, it is not:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_license#Various_versions
Or at the vary le
4 matches
Mail list logo
