On Aug 21, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Quiliro Ordóñez wrote:
Hi Guys/Gals.
I am new to the world of Camping. It looks very simple. I have two issues:
- What types of applications is Camping more suitable than Rails.
Where you want something small and easy.
Or you like knowing exactly what
it! I'll certainly be linking to it
from my blog.
Aria Stewart
aredri...@nbtsc.org
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 15:43 +0100, Magnus Holm wrote:
Okay, boys and girls: Let's get ready for the release!
When it comes to bug tracking, I really like ditz
(http://ditz.rubyforge.org) + sheila (written in Camping;
example: http://masanjin.net:9000/). What do you think?
Sounds great! I
, we need to clear up the rdoc and write howtos for camping with
fastcgi, passenger, and other web servers. I don't know, what do
most people deploy camping on?
Proxied to Mongrel and using FastCGI, both.
I intend to use swiftiply at some point.
Aria Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED
mongrel.rb).
Splendid! If we can say Camping, the 3K Microframework, then I
think we will really have a reason to bump the big number. I'll wait
for a reaction from zimbatm, but I am euphoric about these changes.
Oh, that's wonderful! I really like it!
Aria Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On May 4, 2008, at 10:14 PM, John Beppu wrote:
This is an informal poll.
If you are primarily a Ruby programmer,
- What was your primary language before you started coding in Ruby?
Else,
- What's your current programming language of choice?
Perl, PHP, ObjectiveC, depending on task.
On Feb 25, 2008, at 2:21 PM, Albert Ng wrote:
I'll keep that in mind.
As an aside, using this gem, how would I go about changing the user
without closing the browser or raising «Unauthorized»? That last
pops up a log-in window that can't authorize (have to press escape).
You can't.
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 20:07 -0500, Jeremy McAnally wrote:
Hmm yes the direct FastCGI support could be supplanted by making sure
we have a solid and tested Rack adapter. That way they still get the
FastCGI support but we don't have to maintain all the evil parts of
it.
I'll look through
On Oct 5, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Evan Weaver wrote:
Sure, and maybe it doesn't really need to be process-persistent.
Wouldn't that limit you to non-load-balanced apps, since you could
only have one simultaneous process if you want session consistency?
Evan
Can always make it easy and
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 22:50 +0200, Jonas Pfenniger wrote:
2007/9/28, Nathaniel Talbott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As far as I can tell, sending an actual HTTP PUT request to a Camping
app will never parse the params out of the request body - or am I
going nuts?
No you aren't at all. Actually,
10 matches
Mail list logo
