On 9/28/07, Nathaniel Talbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems to me that most restful frameworks are assuming that you can
> PUT the same as you can POST, i.e. that other than the verb (and what
> you might do with it) the two will be treated the same.
This is a horrible Rails-ism, in my opi
On 9/28/07, Nathaniel Talbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I can tell, sending an actual HTTP PUT request to a Camping
> app will never parse the params out of the request body - or am I
> going nuts? This code seems to say only POST's will parse the request
> body:
>
> elsif @method ==
On 5/4/07, Nic Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Who's bringing the internet to the campground?
If I can scrounge up some cables, I've got two different phones
(personal and work) with unlimited data service, so I'll tent-atively
(sorry) commit to being responsible for bandwidth. Of course, ev
I had actually thought that the campsite idea could be a lot of fun.
There's a campground just outside of Portland called Oxbow along the
Sandy river that's just close enough to have cell phone service (i.e.,
'net connection) and AC at the campsites, but secluded and quiet at
night.
Since I won't
On 4/25/07, Jonathan Stott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would recommend a cronjob, solving it with a long running process
> > will likely get you in trouble with memory leaks and such.
> >
> > Manfred
>
> I'm not quite sure how this is relevant (though I fully admit I might
> be missing some of
On 2/11/07, Bil Kleb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, I'm thinking either a stand-alone executable (via
> RubyScript2Exe?) or a set of static HTML pages they could
> load locally?
I've used both RubyScript2Exe and Exerb in the past, and actually had
quite-good results. It's been a while since I ha
On 2/9/07, Bil Kleb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone have a non-database-backed Camping app with tabs
they could share as an example? (Or suggest an alternative
approach entirely.)
Leaving out the database is easy -- just don't inherit from Base
(a.k.a. ActiveRecord::Base) in your model
On 1/28/07, Michael Daines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm interested in how one can skip the database altogether, though.
> This seems like something that must have come up here before? But
> personally, I threw together a little number I like to call
> DirectoryModel[1] that just keeps track of
On 1/27/07, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> I'll probably end up using ActiveRecord. I just get caught up
> sometimes in the memory game, and hate seeing my memory usage sky
> rocket as I pull large results. But if I have the memory, why not use
> it to my advantage!
This is one of th
On 1/26/07, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been playing around with using DBI instead of ActiveRecord 'cause
> I just love to beat myself up! ;) Is this an okay way to do this, or
> is there any other more creative ways?
The code looks like it'll *work*, but you're not going to
10 matches
Mail list logo
