I was able to get camping 1.9 to work with rack 0.9 by using a copy
pulled from the repository for rack listed on github.
git clone git://github.com/rack/rack.git
Paul
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:06:57PM -0700, Garret Buell wrote:
Ok, scratch that last. Turns out camping works just fine with
On 29 Mar 2009, at 07:06, Garret Buell wrote:
Would we gain anything by making the switch?
Everybody would gain. Content-length is a requirement of the latest
Rack spec, presumaby to allow for easier caching, and you have to set
it _unless_ you send out chunked - but then you have to state
Well, this issue is actually solved in the latest master :-)
Maybe it's time to release this thing... I'm way to lazy :/
//Magnus Holm
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 20:45, Julik Tarkhanov
julian.tarkha...@gmail.comwrote:
On 29 Mar 2009, at 07:06, Garret Buell wrote:
Would we gain anything by
What about using the github gem server?
http://github.com/blog/51-github-s-rubygem-server
That way the most current camping could be installed with a
gem install judofyr-camping
Instead of having to download and build it (marginally more difficult)
-Garret Buell
2009/3/29 Magnus Holm
Ok, scratch that last. Turns out camping works just fine with Rack 0.4
so it seems the change was with 0.9. I'm not too familiar with Rack --
what changes would we need to make to get camping working with Rack
0.9? Would we gain anything by making the switch?
-Garret
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at
5 matches
Mail list logo
