Sounds good. Relaxed is what I went with and it seemed to make TSAN happy.
I uploaded a pull request for this (and the UBSAN issue).
Thanks for your guidance on this.
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 12:14 PM Kenton Varda wrote:
> An atomic read with "relaxed" ordering should be free. Even "acquire"
> o
An atomic read with "relaxed" ordering should be free. Even "acquire"
ordering (if TSAN insists on it) is free on x86. So I'd just have it always
be atomic.
-Kenton
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 4:23 PM Vitali Lovich wrote:
> Ok. That seems to have made TSAN happy (I still don't understand the exact
>