Re: [capnproto] Parallelism in capnp

2018-12-10 Thread Pappu
Hi Kenton and Ian, Thank you so much for your kind reply. Yes, will ask you more specific question when I reach that point. Regards On Friday, December 7, 2018 at 3:19:01 PM UTC-8, Kenton Varda wrote: > > Hi Pappu, > > "Parallelism" can mean many things and is a huge topic. You'll probably > ne

Re: [capnproto] Parallelism in capnp

2018-12-07 Thread 'Kenton Varda' via Cap'n Proto
Hi Pappu, "Parallelism" can mean many things and is a huge topic. You'll probably need to ask a more specific question to get the answers you seek. Cap'n Proto serialization is agnostic to concurrency. It's up to you to make sure a thread has exclusive access to a message before trying to modify

Re: [capnproto] Parallelism in capnp

2018-12-07 Thread Ian Denhardt
The C++ RPC implementation is not thread safe, if that's what you're asking. The only stable RPC implementation that is is the Go one. (The Haskell implementation I'm working on is as well, but it's not quite ready yet). Quoting Pappu (2018-12-07 16:38:07) >Hi, >I am new to capnp. Is there

[capnproto] Parallelism in capnp

2018-12-07 Thread Pappu
Hi, I am new to capnp. Is there any kind of parallelism supported in capnp? If so, could you please kindly give me some pointers on this? Thanks a lot -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cap'n Proto" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop recei