Thanks Martin for raising the issues on git for tracking.
Thanks,
Subash
From: Martin Thomson
Date: Monday, May 11, 2020 at 3:46 PM
To: "Tirupachur Comerica, Subash" ,
"last-c...@ietf.org"
Cc: "capport-cha...@ietf.org" ,
"draft-ietf-capport-architect...@ietf.org"
,
Editors,
I've opened a few issues on the comments Subash indicated were still pending.
I think that we can take these as last call comments in the usual fashion. I
don't see a pressing reason to update the draft, but it would be nice if you
could take a look at the remaining items to see if
Hello,
At 09:54 AM 11-05-2020, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Captive Portal Interaction WG
(capport) to consider the following document: - 'CAPPORT Architecture'
as Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
I am curious why section 3.4 does not consider the MAC Address as a
possible identifier?
--
Bob Harold
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:56 PM The IESG wrote:
>
> The IESG has received a request from the Captive Portal Interaction WG
> (capport) to consider the following document: - 'CAPPORT
The IESG has received a request from the Captive Portal Interaction WG
(capport) to consider the following document: - 'CAPPORT Architecture'
as Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive
Sorry, no... I missed the date: they would all be on the 4 June
telechat. The last call on the architecture doc won't be finished
before 21 May.
Barry
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:38 PM Barry Leiba wrote:
>
> Yes, that's the plan.
>
> Barry
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:16 PM Michael Richardson
Yes, that's the plan.
Barry
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:16 PM Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Barry Leiba wrote:
> > Martin, should I hold the telechat scheduling of the other two
> > documents to make sure that architecture is on the same telechat as
> > they are, so the IESG is
Barry Leiba wrote:
> Martin, should I hold the telechat scheduling of the other two
> documents to make sure that architecture is on the same telechat as
> they are, so the IESG is reviewing them all together? I think that's
> best, but can be convinced not to have the others
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Captive Portal Interaction WG of the IETF.
Title : CAPPORT Architecture
Authors : Kyle Larose
David Dolson
Hey Barry,
I'll upload one shortly. Sorry about the delay.
On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 09:18, Barry Leiba wrote:
> Can we get a revised I-D up on this now, so I can get the last call
> started? The last calls on the other two documents are ending this
> week.
>
> Martin, should I hold the telechat
Can we get a revised I-D up on this now, so I can get the last call
started? The last calls on the other two documents are ending this
week.
Martin, should I hold the telechat scheduling of the other two
documents to make sure that architecture is on the same telechat as
they are, so the IESG is
11 matches
Mail list logo
