not mesh well
with the rest.
In fact, it would probably simplify a lot of things, if the portal was
also a DoH node by default.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mailhot
___
Captive-portals mailing list
Captive-portals@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman
Le mercredi 31 juillet 2019 à 17:00 -0400, Michael Richardson a écrit :
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> >> It probably occurs less in places like airports, hotels and
> >> enterprises where there is more local operational clue.
>
> > In entrerprises
anges, as long as they match the whitelist published by the central
portal for those ranges).
--
Nicolas Mailhot
___
Captive-portals mailing list
Captive-portals@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
honest people but not terrorists” land
(whatever *your* definition of honest people is). Humans have morals.
Tech and tools do not. That's been true since humans picked up their
first stone and used it to cruch nuts or fellow human beings.
Regards,
--
Nicolas M
presence of small children).
When the IETF tries to pretend, that the default is different from the
one any last year IT student will naturally implement, it is taking a
political not technical stance. It is sabotaging its own standards. It
is discrediting
information (credit card, credentials) and there
will be zero browser buy-in otherwise anyway
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mailhot
___
Captive-portals mailing list
Captive-portals@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
, is heresy)
--
Nicolas Mailhot
___
Captive-portals mailing list
Captive-portals@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals