ave
>
>
> From: David Bird [mailto:db...@google.com <mailto:db...@google.com>]
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:39 AM
> To: Tommy Pauly
> Cc: Dave Dolson; Eric Vyncke (evyncke); captive-portals@ietf.org
> <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [Capt
>]
> Sent: Saturday, July 8, 2017 9:15 PM
> To: Dave Dolson
> Cc: Eric Vyncke (evyncke); captive-portals@ietf.org
> <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>; David Bird
> Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Use Case: "Carrier Grade Captive Portal"
>
>
>
>
&g
: Dave Dolson; Eric Vyncke (evyncke); captive-portals@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Use Case: "Carrier Grade Captive Portal"
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Tommy Pauly
mailto:tpa...@apple.com>> wrote:
[snip]
The idea with explicit PvD discovery is that it would, as a
”. This ought to speed up network association.
-Dave
From: tpa...@apple.com [mailto:tpa...@apple.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 8, 2017 9:15 PM
To: Dave Dolson
Cc: Eric Vyncke (evyncke); captive-portals@ietf.org; David Bird
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Use Case: "Carrier Grade Captive Portal&qu
; -Dave
>
>
>
> From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) [mailto:evyn...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2017 8:27 PM
> To: Dave Dolson; captive-portals@ietf.org
> Cc: David Bird
> Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Use Case: "Carrier Grade Captive Portal"
>
> At le
From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) [mailto:evyn...@cisco.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2017 8:27 PM
To: Dave Dolson; captive-portals@ietf.org
Cc: David Bird
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Use Case: "Carrier Grade Captive Portal"
At least Erik Kline and myself are following the captive-p
: "captive-portals@ietf.org"
Cc: David Bird
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Use Case: "Carrier Grade Captive Portal"
[resend with fewer recipients to avoid mailing list problems]
To echo David’s request,
> If the authors of the PvD concept (re-)present their I-D to the mai
une 14, 2017 9:36 AM
To: Erik Kline
Cc: Gunther Nitzsche; Mark Townsley; Heiko Folkerts; Martin Thomson;
captive-portals@ietf.org; Livingood, Jason; Herzig, Willi; Warren Kumari; Dave
Dolson
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Use Case: "Carrier Grade Captive Portal"
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 a
> Some observations, and questions for the working group.
>
> I'm not sure we have enough input on whether 511 is useful or not. There
> seemed to be some suggestion
> it would help, and some that it wouldn't. Perhaps one question we could ask
> is whether it's harmful? And
> if we agree it's
Erik Kline wrote:
> Some observations, and questions for the working group.
> I'm not sure we have enough input on whether 511 is useful or not.
> There seemed to be some suggestion it would help, and some that it
> wouldn't. Perhaps one question we could ask is whether it's harm
On 02.06.2017 14:47, Livingood, Jason wrote:
> [JL] But let me summarize the malware/hacked IoT device use case. A computing
> device is compromised and being used as part of a DDoS attack (a la the Dyn
> attack) or sending spam or doing keylogging or whatever. One alternative is
> to put them i
On 2 June 2017 at 22:47, Livingood, Jason wrote:
> I’m merely confirming that others share the same use case specified by the
> German Federal Office for Information Security.
Yeah, I can agree that this is a very common desire. And I'm glad
that it's the use case that matters, because I believ
On 5/31/17, 9:07 PM, "Martin Thomson" wrote:
On 1 June 2017 at 08:23, Livingood, Jason
wrote:
> In any case, this is very much in scope IMO – so agree with others here.
With the rise of IoT compromises the need for these sorts of notifications will
only rise and will be critical to ma
On 1 June 2017 at 08:23, Livingood, Jason wrote:
> In any case, this is very much in scope IMO – so agree with others here. With
> the rise of IoT compromises the need for these sorts of notifications will
> only rise and will be critical to maintaining the security & integrity of the
> Interne
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Captive-portals [mailto:captive-portals-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Heiko Folkerts
> Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 8:43 AM
> To: captive-portals@ietf.org
> Cc: Herzig, Willi; Gunther Nitzsche
> Subject: [Cap
mei 2017 14:14
Aan: David Bird
CC: Heiko Folkerts; captive-portals@ietf.org; Herzig, Willi
Onderwerp: Re: [Captive-portals] Use Case: "Carrier Grade Captive Portal"
Hello,
thanks for your reply. Let me argue against ..:)
On 17.05.2017 17:11, David Bird wrote:
>
>
> We need to stop the
, May 18, 2017 8:14 AM
To: David Bird
Cc: Heiko Folkerts; captive-portals@ietf.org; Herzig, Willi
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Use Case: "Carrier Grade Captive Portal"
Hello,
thanks for your reply. Let me argue against ..:)
On 17.05.2017 17:11, David Bird wrote:
>
>
> We n
Hello,
thanks for your reply. Let me argue against ..:)
On 17.05.2017 17:11, David Bird wrote:
>
>
> We need to stop the 443 redirecting!
>
> Thus far, I don't see any reason why ICMP wouldn't work. In fact, if
> *no* ICMP worked, some basic networking stops working (general dest
> unreach, MTU d
Hello everybody,
On 03.05.2017 14:42, Heiko Folkerts wrote:
>Hi everybody, I visited the capport WG the first time in Chicago. Thank
you very much for the presentations!
>Afterwards I had a very brief chat with Martin about a use case, I name
“carrier grade captive portals”.
>As a result I want t
Mark Nottingham wrote:
> That's useful as long as the client is a human is behind a browser. It
> can also break lots of stuff...
Exactly why the ICMP is useful :-)
--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
gt; > only a WiFi (layer 2) problem.
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Captive-portals [mailto:captive-portals-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
> > Of Heiko Folkerts
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 8:43 AM
> > To: captive-portals@ietf.org
> >
; To: captive-portals@ietf.org
> Cc: Herzig, Willi; Gunther Nitzsche
> Subject: [Captive-portals] Use Case: "Carrier Grade Captive Portal"
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I visited the capport WG the first time in Chicago. Thank you very much for
> the presentations! Afterwar
Folkerts
Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 8:43 AM
To: captive-portals@ietf.org
Cc: Herzig, Willi; Gunther Nitzsche
Subject: [Captive-portals] Use Case: "Carrier Grade Captive Portal"
Hi everybody,
I visited the capport WG the first time in Chicago. Thank you very much for the
presentations!
Hi everybody,
I visited the capport WG the first time in Chicago. Thank you very much for
the presentations! Afterwards I had a very brief chat with Martin about a use
case, I name “carrier grade captive portals”. As a result I want to present
this use case to you on this mailing list:
*Backgr
24 matches
Mail list logo
