[Carbon-dev] "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build was SUCCESSFUL"

[INFO] Extracting feature org.wso2.carbon:org.wso2.carbon.registry.ws.feature [INFO] Extracting feature org.wso2.carbon:org.wso2.carbon.governance.lifecycle.management.feature [INFO] Extracting feature org.wso2.carbon:org.wso2.carbon.governance.gadgets.feature [INFO] Extracting feature org.wso2.

Re: [Carbon-dev] Chunk-2 release readiness - on Carbon 3.1.0

Hi Amila, Can you please look at these BRS L1 issues and fix. [1]https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-8376 - HTTP 500 error is thrown with ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.axis2.client.Stub when accessing rule service dashbaord [2]https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-8131 Thanks Charitha On Tue

Re: [Carbon-dev] WSO2 Committers += Kasun Weranga

Congratulations On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote: > Hi KasunW, > > It is my pleasure to welcome you as a WSO2 committer. Thank you for your > contributions. Congrats & welcome aboard! > > Thanks, > Senaka. > > -- > *Senaka Fernando* > Associate Technical Lead & Product

Re: [Carbon-dev] WSO2 Committers += Kasun Weranga

Congratulations...!!! On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote: > Hi KasunW, > > It is my pleasure to welcome you as a WSO2 committer. Thank you for your > contributions. Congrats & welcome aboard! > > Thanks, > Senaka. > > -- > *Senaka Fernando* > Associate Technical Lead & Produ

[Carbon-dev] WSO2 Committers += Kasun Weranga

Hi KasunW, It is my pleasure to welcome you as a WSO2 committer. Thank you for your contributions. Congrats & welcome aboard! Thanks, Senaka. -- *Senaka Fernando* Associate Technical Lead & Product Manager - WSO2 G-Reg; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com* Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apa

Re: [Carbon-dev] Chunk-2 release readiness - on Carbon 3.1.0

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Thilina Buddhika wrote: > Fixed IS, DSS and BRS. The fix was already there for GS. Great! Thanks, Thanks, Samisa... Samisa Abeysinghe VP Engineering WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com http://wso2.org ___ Carbon-dev mailing li

Re: [Carbon-dev] Chunk-2 release readiness - on Carbon 3.1.0

Fixed IS, DSS and BRS. The fix was already there for GS. Thanks, Thilina On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Thilina Buddhika wrote: > Sameera has fixed this properly for Chunk1 products. He gave me a pointer > to do it in rest of the products. > > Will fix it for the Chunk 2 products. > > Thanks,

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon-3.1.0 chunk 2 builds for testing

We still do not see IS and DSS packs at http://10.100.1.43/~carbon/releases/carbon/3.1.0/latest/ Please host these packs. Regards Charitha On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:40 PM, pavithra madurangi wrote: > >> IS, BRS and DSS packs are

Re: [Carbon-dev] Chunk-2 release readiness - on Carbon 3.1.0

Hi all, Can we please move DSS to chunk 3? We just started chunk2 testing and we will not be able to complete all testing before holidays. Regards Charitha On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Prabath Siriwardana wrote: > [resending with the correct subject] > > Hi Nuwan, Asela, Anjana, > > Can you

Re: [Carbon-dev] Chunk-2 release readiness - on Carbon 3.1.0

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Thilina Buddhika > wrote: >> >> Sameera has fixed this properly for Chunk1 products. He gave me a pointer >> to do it in rest of the products. >> Will fix it for the Chunk 2 products. > > We also ne

[Carbon-dev] [ANN] WSO2 Mashup Server 2.2.0 Released!

*"Create, deploy, and consume Web services Mashups in the simplest fashion." * The WSO2 Mashup Server is a powerful yet simple and quick way to tailor Web-based information to the personal needs of individuals and organizations.It is a platform for acquiring data from a variety of sources includin

Re: [Carbon-dev] Chunk-2 release readiness - on Carbon 3.1.0

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Thilina Buddhika wrote: > Sameera has fixed this properly for Chunk1 products. He gave me a pointer > to do it in rest of the products. > > Will fix it for the Chunk 2 products. > We also need to build chunk2 p2 repo. Pradeep can you take on that? Thanks, Samisa

Re: [Carbon-dev] Why Apacheds and Qpid componets are kept as orbit bundles?

Hi Amila, Some answers in-line. On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Amila Suriarachchi wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Amila Jayasekara wrote: > >> Hi Amila, >> ApacheDS interfaces were significantly changing from one version to >> another. Therefore we wrapped some of their interfa

[Carbon-dev] What replaces the functionality of CommonTransportAdmin class

Hi, Inside old CSG code it uses a transport related class called "org.wso2.carbon.core.transports.CommonTransportAdmin" which includes a method called "updateGloballyDefinedOutParameters()". Now we don't have that class and Is there any replacement for this method? Or any thing which I missed here

Re: [Carbon-dev] Chunk-2 release readiness - on Carbon 3.1.0

Sameera has fixed this properly for Chunk1 products. He gave me a pointer to do it in rest of the products. Will fix it for the Chunk 2 products. Thanks, Thilina On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Asela Pathberiya wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > >> Some o

Re: [Carbon-dev] JMS broker configuration in broker component

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Hiranya Jayathilaka wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura > wrote: > >> In that case isn't it the user's responsibility to provide a complete, >>> fully qualified JNDI object name? We can of course make it easier by >>> providing

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon 3.1.0. branch Synapse dependency is not versioned

Hi, On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Supun Kamburugamuva wrote: > Please move the existing synapse to a folder under 2.1.0-wso2v1 and create > the new version. sure will do that :) thnx, Udayanga ___ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org https:

[Carbon-dev] Products in chunk 2 who uses dashboard; Please use dashboard 3.1.1

Hi Guys, Products in Chunk 2, who uses dashboard, please do use* dashboard 3.1.1*, This will provide you some important improvements in gadget loading time / role based permission etc. -- Thanks & Regards, Nuwan Bandara WSO2 Inc. | http://wso2.com lean . enterprise . middleware http://www.nuwa

Re: [Carbon-dev] Chunk-2 release readiness - on Carbon 3.1.0

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Asela Pathberiya wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > >> Some of the chunk 2 product builds are broken. >> > >> Release managers need to have a look and fix these ASAP. >> > > There was a issue with wss4j version. Thilina has al

Re: [Carbon-dev] Chunk-2 release readiness - on Carbon 3.1.0

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > Some of the chunk 2 product builds are broken. > > Release managers need to have a look and fix these ASAP. > There was a issue with wss4j version. Thilina has already fixed it. > > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Pradeep Fernando

Re: [Carbon-dev] JMS broker configuration in broker component

Hi, On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura wrote: > In that case isn't it the user's responsibility to provide a complete, >> fully qualified JNDI object name? We can of course make it easier by >> providing some recommendations in the UI depending on the selected JMS >> provider.

Re: [Carbon-dev] JMS broker configuration in broker component

> > In that case isn't it the user's responsibility to provide a complete, > fully qualified JNDI object name? We can of course make it easier by > providing some recommendations in the UI depending on the selected JMS > provider. For instance when Qpid is stated as the broker, we can provide a > t

Re: [Carbon-dev] JMS broker configuration in broker component

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura wrote: > For an example if you take connection factories, in ActiveMQ, you just have > the JNDI name whereas in Qpid you have the format "connectionfactory.[JNDI > Name]". > In that case isn't it the user's responsibility to provide a complet

Re: [Carbon-dev] Plans for Upcoming Releases

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote: > Hi all, > > Now that 3.1.0 chunk1 has been released, we need to get along with fixing > some critical issues that we left over to be patched. Some of these issues > require API and design changes, where as some require new features. > Ther

Re: [Carbon-dev] Need release manager for each product for Carbon 3.1.0 releases

Release managers. Please look into the product build breaks on 3.1.0 branch On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Nuwan Bandara wrote: > Hi, > > I will work on the GS release. > > Regards, > /Nuwan > > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Amila Suriarachchi wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 4:

Re: [Carbon-dev] Updated Invitation: Group A - Code Review @ Mon Dec 13 10am - 11:30am (carbon-dev@wso2.org)

Many improvements have been made before the review & also several code review recommendations have already been incorporated. Please try to incorporate all the remaining changes ASAP and religiously adhere to these conventions & best practices. Also, since this is an Ant & Maven plugin, I think you

Re: [Carbon-dev] JMS broker configuration in broker component

For an example if you take connection factories, in ActiveMQ, you just have the JNDI name whereas in Qpid you have the format "connectionfactory.[JNDI Name]". Danushka On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Hiranya Jayathilaka wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura >

Re: [Carbon-dev] JMS broker configuration in broker component

Hi, On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura wrote: > Hiranya, > > Actually Manjula's concern is how we deal with provider specific JNDI name > formats. > I'm still not getting it :( All we need to connect to a JMS provider is the initial context factory, provider URL and connectio

Re: [Carbon-dev] JMS broker configuration in broker component

Hiranya, Actually Manjula's concern is how we deal with provider specific JNDI name formats. Danushka On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Hiranya Jayathilaka wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Manjula Rathnayake wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Here is how we can configure Qpid broker and Act

[Carbon-dev] "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build was SUCCESSFUL"

[INFO] Extracting feature org.wso2.carbon:org.wso2.carbon.registry.ws.feature [INFO] Extracting feature org.wso2.carbon:org.wso2.carbon.governance.lifecycle.management.feature [INFO] Extracting feature org.wso2.carbon:org.wso2.carbon.governance.gadgets.feature [INFO] Extracting feature org.wso2.

Re: [Carbon-dev] Plans for Upcoming Releases

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > So we will finish off with 3.1.0 branch with chunk 2 releases, and focus on > 3.2.0 from Jan and do Chunk 3 and other patch releases based on 3.2.0 > > We will merge 3.1.0 with trunk and then branch off 3.2.0 from trunk in the > process.

Re: [Carbon-dev] JMS broker configuration in broker component

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Manjula Rathnayake wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is how we can configure Qpid broker and ActiveMQ broker in broker > component. > > Qpid broker configuration: > > > java.naming.factory.initial = > org.apache.qpid.jndi.PropertiesFileInitialContextFactory > connectionfac

Re: [Carbon-dev] Updated Invitation: Group A - Code Review @ Mon Dec 13 10am - 11:30am (carbon-dev@wso2.org)

I think Azeez's point is that FindBugs needs to be run (and suggested improvements made) AND code verified to follow the coding conventions *BEFORE* the code review. That way time is not wasted on mundane things! Sanjiva. On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Harshana Martin wrote: > This code in t

Re: [Carbon-dev] Updated Invitation: Group A - Code Review @ Mon Dec 13 10am - 11:30am (carbon-dev@wso2.org)

This code in the crucible review was committed to it last Friday and I have done lot of improvements to the code after that. But those changes are not synced here. But the code needs to be improved further and will do the rest of the improvements ASAP as instructed by Azeez, Ruwan and others. Than

[Carbon-dev] [ANN] WSO2 Business Process Server 2.0.2 Released!

WSO2 Business Process Server(BPS) 2.0.2 Released! WSO2 Business Process Server(BPS) team is pleased to announce the release of version 2.0.2 of the Open Source Business Process Server. WSO2 Business Process Server (BPS) is an easy-to-use Open Source Business Process Server that executes business

Re: [Carbon-dev] IS build error {was: Carbon-3.1.0 chunk 2 builds for testing

Fixed as of r83999. Thanks, Thilina On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > [INFO] > > [ERROR] BUILD ERROR > [INFO] > > [INFO] Fa

Re: [Carbon-dev] Updated Invitation: Group A - Code Review @ Mon Dec 13 10am - 11:30am (carbon-dev@wso2.org)

Please revisit my WSO2 Software Development Process presentation [1] 1. https://docs.google.com/a/wso2.com/present/edit?id=0AXW7aoJmJW4wZGYzMnc2djJfMzVmd3M0bTNoZw&hl=en On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:0

Re: [Carbon-dev] Updated Invitation: Group A - Code Review @ Mon Dec 13 10am - 11:30am (carbon-dev@wso2.org)

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > Was FindBugs run on this code? Yes. Findbugs was ran against this code. It did not complaint about other than several minor issues. Will show you it to you tomorrow. > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > >> Please rev

Re: [Carbon-dev] Updated Invitation: Group A - Code Review @ Mon Dec 13 10am - 11:30am (carbon-dev@wso2.org)

Hi Azeez, On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > Please revisit the Crucible component and check out my comments. There are > several convention violations in some of this code. Please take a look and > fix it ASAP. Sure. There were some coding conventions identified during the

Re: [Carbon-dev] Updated Invitation: Group A - Code Review @ Mon Dec 13 10am - 11:30am (carbon-dev@wso2.org)

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > Was FindBugs run on this code? It does not look like it was run :( We should not review any code that was not run through find bugs. It is a waste of time. It should be the first step in the review that the code owner run find bugs and sh

Re: [Carbon-dev] Updated Invitation: Group A - Code Review @ Mon Dec 13 10am - 11:30am (carbon-dev@wso2.org)

Was FindBugs run on this code? On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > Please revisit the Crucible component and check out my comments. There are > several convention violations in some of this code. Please take a look and > fix it ASAP. > > Thanks > Azeez > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 20

Re: [Carbon-dev] Chunk-2 release readiness - on Carbon 3.1.0

Some of the chunk 2 product builds are broken. Release managers need to have a look and fix these ASAP. On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Pradeep Fernando wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Sameera Jayasoma > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Can we unfroze the Branch for chunk2 products? Btw we ar

Re: [Carbon-dev] "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build was SUCCESSFUL"

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > These are failing due to feature errors. > > Product teams please have a look. > And you can find errors in the build log file: http://10.100.1.43/~carbon/releases/carbon/3.1.0/latest/build.log Thanks, Samisa... Samisa Abeysinghe VP E

Re: [Carbon-dev] "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build was SUCCESSFUL"

These are failing due to feature errors. Product teams please have a look. On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:47 PM, pavithra madurangi wrote: > IS, BRS and DSS packs are not available at > http://10.100.1.43/~carbon/releases/carbon/3.1.0/latest/

[Carbon-dev] BRS, BPS, ESB build errors {was: Carbon-3.1.0 chunk 2 builds for testing

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > [INFO] > > [ERROR] BUILD ERROR > [INFO] > > [INFO] Failed to install features... > > > On M

[Carbon-dev] BAM build error {was : Carbon-3.1.0 chunk 2 builds for testing}

Downloading: http://ws.zones.apache.org/repository2/org/wso2/maven/carbon-p2-plugin/1.3-SNAPSHOT/carbon-p2-plugin-1.3-SNAPSHOT.pom [INFO] Unable to find resource 'org.wso2.maven:carbon-p2-plugin:pom:1.3-SNAPSHOT' in repository ws-zones-repository (http://ws.zones.apache.org/repository2) [INFO]

[Carbon-dev] DS build error {was Carbon-3.1.0 chunk 2 builds for testing

[INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM). Project ID: org.wso2.maven:carbon-p2-plugin Reason: POM '

[Carbon-dev] IS build error {was: Carbon-3.1.0 chunk 2 builds for testing

[INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Failed to install features... On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 13

Re: [Carbon-dev] "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build was SUCCESSFUL"

IS, BRS and DSS packs are not available at http://10.100.1.43/~carbon/releases/carbon/3.1.0/latest/ Pavithra On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:57 PM, WSO2 Builder wrote: > [INFO] Extracting feature > org.wso2.carbon:org.wso2.carbon.registry.ws

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon-3.1.0 chunk 2 builds for testing

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:40 PM, pavithra madurangi wrote: > IS, BRS and DSS packs are not available at > http://10.100.1.43/~carbon/releases/carbon/3.1.0/latest/ These products must have some build breaks. Can the product teams please

Re: [Carbon-dev] Plans for Upcoming Releases

So we will finish off with 3.1.0 branch with chunk 2 releases, and focus on 3.2.0 from Jan and do Chunk 3 and other patch releases based on 3.2.0 We will merge 3.1.0 with trunk and then branch off 3.2.0 from trunk in the process. On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote: > Hi all,

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon-3.1.0 chunk 2 builds for testing

IS, BRS and DSS packs are not available at http://10.100.1.43/~carbon/releases/carbon/3.1.0/latest/ Pavithra On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > Packs available: > http://10.100.1.43/~carbon/releases/carbon/3.1

Re: [Carbon-dev] Updated Invitation: Group A - Code Review @ Mon Dec 13 10am - 11:30am (carbon-dev@wso2.org)

Please revisit the Crucible component and check out my comments. There are several convention violations in some of this code. Please take a look and fix it ASAP. Thanks Azeez On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Hasini Gunasinghe wrote: > Notes of this code review was recorded in the crucible pro

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon-3.1.0 chunk 2 builds for testing

Packs available: http://10.100.1.43/~carbon/releases/carbon/3.1.0/latest/ On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Charitha Kankanamge > wrote: > >> Folks, >> Can someone please host chunk2 {BRS, IS, DSS, GS} packs to start testing. >> I

[Carbon-dev] "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build was SUCCESSFUL"

[INFO] Extracting feature org.wso2.carbon:org.wso2.carbon.registry.ws.feature [INFO] Extracting feature org.wso2.carbon:org.wso2.carbon.governance.lifecycle.management.feature [INFO] Extracting feature org.wso2.carbon:org.wso2.carbon.governance.gadgets.feature [INFO] Extracting feature org.wso2.

[Carbon-dev] Chunk 3 products based on Carbon 3.2.0?

We will be done with Chunk 2 this week. And we have already identified and fixed some critical bugs on chunk 1. So we need to do a 3.2.0 of Carbon - as there are some API changes into Carbon core (Azeez to elaborate) Shall we do Chunk 3 based on 3.2.0? That is ESB and BAM, they will not have 3.1

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon 3.1.0. branch Synapse dependency is not versioned

Please move the existing synapse to a folder under 2.1.0-wso2v1 and create the new version. Thanks, Supun.. On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Udayanga Wickramasinghe wrote: > Hi, > i find $subject with Carbon release 3.1.0 . i guess we need to have two > versions of Synapse here 2.1.0-wso2v1 and

[Carbon-dev] Carbon 3.1.0. branch Synapse dependency is not versioned

Hi, i find $subject with Carbon release 3.1.0 . i guess we need to have two versions of Synapse here 2.1.0-wso2v1 and 2.1.0-wso2v2 ?? . i need to have 2.1.0-wso2v2 to apply a new feature for synapse as well.. what action should i take? . thnx in advance :) Regards, Udayanga __

Re: [Carbon-dev] JMS broker configuration in broker component

Hi all, Here is how we can configure Qpid broker and ActiveMQ broker in broker component. Qpid broker configuration: java.naming.factory.initial = org.apache.qpid.jndi.PropertiesFileInitialContextFactory connectionfactory.Connection_Factory_Lookup_Name = amqp://guest:gu...@clientid/test?brokerli

[Carbon-dev] Plans for Upcoming Releases

Hi all, Now that 3.1.0 chunk1 has been released, we need to get along with fixing some critical issues that we left over to be patched. Some of these issues require API and design changes, where as some require new features. Therefore, we have decided to go for Carbon 3.2.0 soon after Carbon 3.1.0

Re: [Carbon-dev] "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build has FAILED"

There was a problem in the build script. That is fixed now. The next build should succeed. On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:22 PM, WSO2 Builder wrote: > [INFO] Not compiling test sources > [INFO] [surefire:test] > [INFO] Tests are skipped. > [INFO] [jar:jar] > [INFO] Building jar: > /home/carbon/strat

Re: [Carbon-dev] GS load testing with loadUI

Hi On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Charitha Kankanamge wrote: > It seems LoadUI[1] can be used easily for UI level load testing. > > Nirodha, please have a look and try to use this for load test GS. > > Also, we may need to fix the following open perf issues reported by Yumani > which have been

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon bundle package Import issue.

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Sameera Jayasoma wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Amila Suriarachchi wrote: > >> When I deploy this bundle it gives me this exception. >> >> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/jms/JMSException >> at >> org.wso2.carbon.broker.core.internal.jms.J