[Carbon-dev] Product teams, please fix SVN externals for Carbon 3.2.1 products

$subject I have only created the branches, and changed product versions. Thanks Azeez -- *Afkham Azeez* Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ * ** email: **az...@wso2.com* * cell: +94 77 3320919 b

Re: [Carbon-dev] Dependency exclusions for remaining orbits + components

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar < shan...@wso2.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am planning to do $subject before 3.3.0 release. Hence, will > un-graduate all graduated orbits + components to trunk. +1. Thanks, Senaka. > Please let me > know if there are any issues. > > Re

[Carbon-dev] ApacheDS as default user store of core ?

Hi All, It seems that lot of members were under the impression that embedded LDAP server is not binding an address. Thus most of the people are under the impression that it behaves like H2. But this is not the case. We (me, Shankar, Amila and Azeez) had a discussion about this. As per our current

[Carbon-dev] Dependency exclusions for remaining orbits + components

Hi, I am planning to do $subject before 3.3.0 release. Hence, will un-graduate all graduated orbits + components to trunk. Please let me know if there are any issues. Regards, Shankar -- S.Uthaiyashankar Senior Architect & Senior Manager WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com/ - "lean . enterprise . middlew

Re: [Carbon-dev] LB sometimes send malformed XML messages to the backends

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > But it is still solved with your fix (wait a bit) right? Yes binary relay > is designed to not store anything :). Yes, my fix solved the issue where members join, and we immediately try to send the message to it. However, while a mes

Re: [Carbon-dev] triggerred a build in the local builder for carbon 3.2.1

> > Can we host these packs in private cloud? > > I'm hosting them now. Thanks ~sanjaya > tx, > dimuthul > > > >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Supun Malinga wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> build is in components level. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Supun Malinga wrote: >>> >

Re: [Carbon-dev] triggerred a build in the local builder for carbon 3.2.1

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Sanjeewa Malalgoda wrote: > Hi All, > New packs of stratos services will be available at > http://10.100.1.43/~carbon/releases/carbon/3.2.1/2011-06-27/. since we > have less space remain will build one by one and upload. > Thanks. > > Can we host these packs in pri

[Carbon-dev] WSO2 p2 maven plugin needs improvements

See the stack trace below. p2 maven plugin lacks of clear error messages. Rajika [INFO] [carbon-p2:p2-repo-gen {execution: 2-p2-repo-generation}] [ERROR] ERROR org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: ERROR at org.wso2.maven.p2.generate.utils.MavenUtils.getResolvedArtifact(MavenUtils.java:

[Carbon-dev] securing of admin services (was: Fwd: [esb-java-user] How to subscribe/unsubscribe to a topic using WS call in WSO2ESB 4.0.0)

The mail below shows one major defect: we are not eating our own dogfood: Step 3 (login to the server via the auth service) should not be needed! Instead we should be protecting the ws-e service with whatever stuff needed! Sanjiva. -- Forwarded message -- From: Amila Suriarachchi

Re: [Carbon-dev] [Stratos-dev] Multi tenanting Qpid component registry access.

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Amila Suriarachchi wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote: > >> Hi Amila, >> >> If you are using the OSGi service, you need to pass the tenant id as a >> parameter. > > > yes. The question I have put is how to get the tenant id when

Re: [Carbon-dev] LB sometimes send malformed XML messages to the backends

But it is still solved with your fix (wait a bit) right? Yes binary relay is designed to not store anything :). Sanjiva. On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > As per Supun, this is because BinaryRelay consumes the message stream, so > there is no way to automatically failover

[Carbon-dev] "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build was SUCCESSFUL"

Repository Root: https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2 Repository UUID: a5903396-d722-0410-b921-86c7d4935375 Revision: 108442 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: danushka Last Changed Rev: 108442 Last Changed Date: 2011-06-27 15:16:29 -0400 (Mon, 27 Jun 2011) [INFO] Extracting fea

Re: [Carbon-dev] Starting 2 carbon products with embedded LDAP enabled

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > It doesn't seem to be critical for 3.2.1 right? What modules will change? I also dont think so. Only ldap server component is changing. Thanks AmilaJ > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Amila Jayasekara wrote: >> >> Created [1]. Should t

Re: [Carbon-dev] [Stratos-dev] Multi tenanting Qpid component registry access.

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote: > Hi Amila, > > If you are using the OSGi service, you need to pass the tenant id as a > parameter. yes. The question I have put is how to get the tenant id when the connection is closed since there is no user associated. > Anyway why d

Re: [Carbon-dev] 3.2.1 stuff on 3.2.0 branch

I don't see anything wrong in that component. It is branched as in the recommended way. pradeeban@pradeeban:~/trunk/stratos/3.2.0/components/logging$ tree -L 3 . |-- org.wso2.carbon.logging.admin.ui | `-- 3.2.0 | |-- pom.xml | |-- src | `-- target |-- org.wso2.carbon.logging.ex

[Carbon-dev] 3.2.1 stuff on 3.2.0 branch

components/logging/org.wso2.carbon.logging.view.ui for an instance. Danushka ___ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev

[Carbon-dev] Getting an unusual error when creating a tenant in my local Stratos setup

Hi, I have setup Stratos locally to run DSS (with the products Stratos Manager 1.5.1, IS 1.5.1, BAM 1.5.1, Governance 1.5.1, DSS 1.5.1). The setting up was successful but when creating a new tenant I get following errors in Stratos Manager. So I can't proceed and need some help on this. [2011-06

[Carbon-dev] "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build has FAILED"

Repository Root: https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2 Repository UUID: a5903396-d722-0410-b921-86c7d4935375 Revision: 108442 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: danushka Last Changed Rev: 108442 Last Changed Date: 2011-06-27 15:16:29 -0400 (Mon, 27 Jun 2011) symbol : class Event

[Carbon-dev] "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build was SUCCESSFUL"

Repository Root: https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2 Repository UUID: a5903396-d722-0410-b921-86c7d4935375 Revision: 108438 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: danushka Last Changed Rev: 108438 Last Changed Date: 2011-06-27 14:15:03 -0400 (Mon, 27 Jun 2011) [INFO] Extracting fea

[Carbon-dev] "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build was SUCCESSFUL"

Repository Root: https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2 Repository UUID: a5903396-d722-0410-b921-86c7d4935375 Revision: 108422 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: shariq Last Changed Rev: 108422 Last Changed Date: 2011-06-27 09:07:33 -0400 (Mon, 27 Jun 2011) [INFO] Extracting featu

Re: [Carbon-dev] Multi tenanting Qpid component registry access.

Hi Amila, If you are using the OSGi service, you need to pass the tenant id as a parameter. Anyway why do you need to use the OSGi service? You can get an instance of the registry from the CarbonContext right? Thanks, Senaka. On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Amila Suriarachchi wrote: > hi, > >

Re: [Carbon-dev] Starting 2 carbon products with embedded LDAP enabled

It doesn't seem to be critical for 3.2.1 right? What modules will change? On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Amila Jayasekara wrote: > Created [1]. Should this be part of 3.2.1 release ? > > Thanks > AmilaJ > > [1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-10919 > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Isur

Re: [Carbon-dev] Starting 2 carbon products with embedded LDAP enabled

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Amila Jayasekara wrote: > Hi All, > > We have following behaviour within carbon products. > > Say we need to start 2 carbon servers in the same machine. Both > servers use embedded LDAP server. User forgets to change LDAP server > port in user-mgt.xml configuratio

[Carbon-dev] Wrong implementation UserStoreManager - addRole method

Add role method has implemented like this, public void addRole(String roleName, String[] userList, org.wso2.carbon.user.api.Permission[] permissions) throws org.wso2.carbon.user.api.UserStoreException { addRole(roleName, userList, (Permission[]) permiss

Re: [Carbon-dev] triggerred a build in the local builder for carbon 3.2.1

Hi All, New packs of stratos services will be available at http://10.100.1.43/~carbon/releases/carbon/3.2.1/2011-06-27/. since we have less space remain will build one by one and upload. Thanks. On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Supun Malinga wrote: > Hi, > > build is in components level. > > > O

[Carbon-dev] Carbon 3.2.0 release port-mortem doc

Please find $subject at [1] ENGL came up with those points during a meeting we had last week. The purpose is to learn from each release, and improve the future release process. Feedback welcome, and you can update the doc if we have missed something. Thanks Azeez 1. https://docs.google.com/a/wso

[Carbon-dev] "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build has FAILED"

Repository Root: https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2 Repository UUID: a5903396-d722-0410-b921-86c7d4935375 Revision: 108419 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: ranga Last Changed Rev: 108419 Last Changed Date: 2011-06-27 08:09:28 -0400 (Mon, 27 Jun 2011) symbol : class EventBro

Re: [Carbon-dev] [Stratos-dev] build triggered for 3.2.1 build in ec2 instance

Hi, On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Ranga Siriwardena wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Supun Malinga wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Supun Malinga wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Amila Maha Arachchi wrote: >>> O

Re: [Carbon-dev] Starting 2 carbon products with embedded LDAP enabled

Created [1]. Should this be part of 3.2.1 release ? Thanks AmilaJ [1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-10919 On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Isuru Suriarachchi wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Saminda Wijeratne > wrote: >> >> IMO if the server is not behaving according to the

[Carbon-dev] "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build has FAILED"

Repository Root: https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2 Repository UUID: a5903396-d722-0410-b921-86c7d4935375 Revision: 108413 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: sanjeewa Last Changed Rev: 108411 Last Changed Date: 2011-06-27 06:10:25 -0400 (Mon, 27 Jun 2011) symbol : class Event

Re: [Carbon-dev] "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build has FAILED"

Done. Please let us know if there are any more corrupted jars in the repo. Thanks, ~Chamith On 06/27/2011 04:50 PM, Denis Weerasiri wrote: On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:40 AM, WSO2 Carbon 3.2.0 Builder (US1) mailto:cbuil...@wso2.org>> wrote: Repository Root: https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso

Re: [Carbon-dev] Invitation: Group A: Code Review - ApacheDSUserStoreManager @ Mon Jun 27 2pm - 3pm (ami...@wso2.com)

Add these to the Crucible general notes as well. One issue with this new features is, it is very difficult to troubleshoot when there is a config error. It generally indicates poor error handling & handling of special/default values of params. On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Amila Jayasekara wro

Re: [Carbon-dev] [Stratos-dev] Version of services' poms should be 1.5.1?

All product POMs & distribution versions must change On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Amila Maha Arachchi wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > >> Yes, only if something changes we will introduce new versions. Otherwise, >> we will stick with old versions for compon

Re: [Carbon-dev] [Stratos-dev] Version of services' poms should be 1.5.1?

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > Yes, only if something changes we will introduce new versions. Otherwise, > we will stick with old versions for components, features etc. > Versioning for components and features are clear. But, what about the manager/1.5.1/modules/features

Re: [Carbon-dev] [Stratos-dev] Version of services' poms should be 1.5.1?

Yes, only if something changes we will introduce new versions. Otherwise, we will stick with old versions for components, features etc. On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Muhammed Shariq wrote: > If an artifact hasn't changed then the version should be 1.1.0 for stratos > components. Only if we ar

Re: [Carbon-dev] Error while buiding 3.2.1

This was a local issue. Sorry for the noise. Thanks, ~Isuru On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Isuru Suriarachchi wrote: > [INFO] Scanning for projects... > [INFO] > > [ERROR] FATAL ERROR > [INFO] > -

Re: [Carbon-dev] "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build has FAILED"

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:40 AM, WSO2 Carbon 3.2.0 Builder (US1) < cbuil...@wso2.org> wrote: > Repository Root: https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2 > Repository UUID: a5903396-d722-0410-b921-86c7d4935375 > Revision: 108411 > Node Kind: directory > Schedule: normal > Last Changed Author: sanjeewa > La

Re: [Carbon-dev] [Stratos-dev] Version of services' poms should be 1.5.1?

If an artifact hasn't changed then the version should be 1.1.0 for stratos components. Only if we are branching after 3.2.0, then the version should 3.2.1 and 1.5.1 for stratos. So its not wrong to have 1.1.0 artifacts IMO ... in fact the unchanged artifacts should be referred to as 1.1.0 ? On Mon

[Carbon-dev] Version of services' poms should be 1.5.1?

Hi all, I created 3.2.1 branches for some stratos components and then I had to change the respective versions in manager/1.5.1/modules/features/org.wso2.stratos.manager.server.feature and ui.feature. There I found out their versions are still 1.1.0. This should be 1.5.1. Azeez too confirmed this i

[Carbon-dev] Error while buiding 3.2.1

[INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [ERROR] FATAL ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM). Project ID: org.wso2.carbo

[Carbon-dev] "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build has FAILED"

Repository Root: https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2 Repository UUID: a5903396-d722-0410-b921-86c7d4935375 Revision: 108411 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: sanjeewa Last Changed Rev: 108411 Last Changed Date: 2011-06-27 06:10:25 -0400 (Mon, 27 Jun 2011) T E S T S ---

Re: [Carbon-dev] Starting 2 carbon products with embedded LDAP enabled

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Saminda Wijeratne wrote: > IMO if the server is not behaving according to the given configurations > (specially with configurations related to security), it should fail > with meaningful logs. +1 Thanks, ~Isuru > This could be handled at the OSGi component lev

Re: [Carbon-dev] Starting 2 carbon products with embedded LDAP enabled

IMO if the server is not behaving according to the given configurations (specially with configurations related to security), it should fail with meaningful logs. This could be handled at the OSGi component level. Saminda On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Amila Jayasekara wrote: > Hi All, > > We

[Carbon-dev] Starting 2 carbon products with embedded LDAP enabled

Hi All, We have following behaviour within carbon products. Say we need to start 2 carbon servers in the same machine. Both servers use embedded LDAP server. User forgets to change LDAP server port in user-mgt.xml configuration for second server. Still user will be able to start 2nd server with f

[Carbon-dev] "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build has FAILED"

Repository Root: https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2 Repository UUID: a5903396-d722-0410-b921-86c7d4935375 Revision: 108401 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: shariq Last Changed Rev: 108401 Last Changed Date: 2011-06-27 04:57:52 -0400 (Mon, 27 Jun 2011) Downloading: http://mav

Re: [Carbon-dev] Invitation: Group A: Code Review - ApacheDSUserStoreManager @ Mon Jun 27 2pm - 3pm (ami...@wso2.com)

Code review notes, Apart from crucible notes we discussed about following. 1. Describe configuration properties in user-mgt.xml 2. Group configuration elements in user-mgt.xml 3. Re-factor property names in user-mgt.xml in more sensible way 4. Search for embedded Java interfaces within apacheds 5

[Carbon-dev] Multi tenanting Qpid component registry access.

hi, Currently above functionality is not working since Qpid compoent RegistryClient always get the supper tenant registry. eg UserRegistry registry = registryService.getGovernanceSystemRegistry(); (RegistryClient.java 110) We can simply fix this by passing the tenant ID which can be found from t

Re: [Carbon-dev] "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build has FAILED /home/release1/branches/3.2.1/products/bam/1.3.1"

This has been fixed. Regards Buddhika On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Sanjeewa Malalgoda wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Builder > Date: Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:50 PM > Subject: "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build has FAILED > /home/release1/branches/3.2.1/products/bam/1.

Re: [Carbon-dev] Issue in AS 4.1.0 with New Scheduled Task

Hi Jorge, We've created a jira against this issue at [1] and this will be fixed in 3.2.1 patch release. [1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-10918 Regards, On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Jorge Infante Osorio wrote: > Hi folks. > > ** ** > > I found this $subject as follow: > > *

[Carbon-dev] "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build has FAILED /home/release1/branches/3.2.1/products/bam/1.3.1"

-- Forwarded message -- From: Builder Date: Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:50 PM Subject: "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build has FAILED /home/release1/branches/3.2.1/products/bam/1.3.1" To: sup...@wso2.com, sanje...@wso2.com [2011-06-27 14:50:39,074] INFO {org.apache.axis2.deployment.ModuleD

[Carbon-dev] [ANN] WSO2 WSF/Java 1.0.0 Released

WSO2 Web Services Framework for Java (WSF/Java) 1.0.0 Released WSO2 Web Services Framework for Java (WSF/Java) provides the complete framework for developing Web Services or Web Service clients. Basically this contains all the libraries you need to write a service or client. WSF/Java includes all