+1 for committing changes & moving the build to maven3.
Saminda
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Chathuri Wimalasena wrote:
> +1 for committing changes to CS branch.
>
> Regards,
> Chathuri
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Harshana Martin wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Today I worked on migratin
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Thilina Buddhika wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Tharindu Mathew wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Jun 30, 20
Hi Amila,
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Amila Suriarachchi wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Supun Malinga wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Please make sure you have added relative paths in the components,features,
>> etc.
>> Otherwise you can't build 3.2.1 patch-release pom in a clean
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Supun Malinga wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Please make sure you have added relative paths in the components,features,
> etc.
> Otherwise you can't build 3.2.1 patch-release pom in a clean repo.
>
>
>- How to do this,
>
> Lets take the system-statistics module. There
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Supun Malinga wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> This is still not being done.
>
Fixed for bpel specific components and features.
>
> regards,
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Supun Malinga wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Please make sure you have added relative paths in t
___
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev@wso2.org
http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
We have Hudson, but we will not get rid of the script as that has proven to
be the most efficient.
The best is to make sure to handle the script carefully.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Supun Malinga wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Thanks a lot for the information. We are currently in the process of
>
Fixed some of the identity 3.2.1 components/features where this entry was
missing.
Thanks,
Thilina
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Supun Malinga wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> This is still not being done.
>
> regards,
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Supun Malinga wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Pl
Repository Root: https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2
Repository UUID: a5903396-d722-0410-b921-86c7d4935375
Revision: 108828
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: supunm
Last Changed Rev: 108828
Last Changed Date: 2011-07-01 14:14:59 -0400 (Fri, 01 Jul 2011)
___
Hi folks,
This is still not being done.
regards,
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Supun Malinga wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Please make sure you have added relative paths in the components,features,
> etc.
> Otherwise you can't build 3.2.1 patch-release pom in a clean repo.
>
>
>- How to do this
+1 for committing changes to CS branch.
Regards,
Chathuri
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Harshana Martin wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Today I worked on migrating CS to Tycho. I was able to complete the task
> within few hours (Yeah... Tycho is fantastic and pretty easy to use :) ) and
> now it works
+1 for migrating to Maven3. Maven3 also use M2 repo format, so there wont be
an issue using both versions simultaneously. Only thing is you have to
create a alias for Maven3 executable.
Thanks
Milinda
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Harshana Martin wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Today I worked on migr
Hi All,
Today I worked on migrating CS to Tycho. I was able to complete the task
within few hours (Yeah... Tycho is fantastic and pretty easy to use :) ) and
now it works fine.
But as we discussed before, it needs Maven3. So the question is, should i go
ahead and commit the changes or do we need
Hi All,
Latest packs available at locally following address.
http://10.100.1.43/~carbon/releases/carbon/3.2.1/2011-07-01/
as well as us server.Yesterday night build(2011-06-30)
Thanks.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 7:59 AM, WSO2 Carbon 3.2.0 Builder (US1) <
cbuil...@wso2.org> wrote:
> Repository Root:
Repository Root: https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2
Repository UUID: a5903396-d722-0410-b921-86c7d4935375
Revision: 108816
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: isuru
Last Changed Rev: 108816
Last Changed Date: 2011-07-01 10:30:13 -0400 (Fri, 01 Jul 2011)
Tests run: 21, Failures:
Getting following exception at the shutdown.. Is it due to recent
changes to QPid?
[2011-07-01 21:44:51,554] ERROR
{org.wso2.carbon.qpid.authorization.service.qpid.QpidAuthorizationPlugin}
- Error while invoking QpidAuthorizationHan
dler
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.wso2.carbon.
Hi all,
This may sound like a really basic question. I am raking code, but I cannot
find a way to do it. If i write a cache extending from
org.wso2.carbon.caching.core.BaseCache from where can I set the cache
expiration time? Do we have to use the cache.xml for it, I can't find any
parameter there
Hi Dave,
Thanks a lot for the information. We are currently in the process of
integrating our build system with Hudson.
Cheers,
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:03 PM, David Carver wrote:
> **
> As one of the people that got bombarded by this, is there any reason you
> aren't using something like Huds
As one of the people that got bombarded by this, is there any reason you
aren't using something like Hudson or Jenkins to run your Integration
builds?They have email notification ability built in, and are widely
configurable. Plus you don't need to try and hunt down any special PID
or task
Hi Devs,
/patch-releases/3.2.1/pom.xml is getting harder to manage as lots of stuff
is being added. Hence we are going to change the structure as follows. So if
you are adding a service-stub, component, etc you have to add those into
poms in respective folders and not into the /patch-releases/3.2.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Vijayaratha Vijayasingam wrote:
> This is the current order defined in the pom;
>
>
>
> ../../components/cassandra/org.wso2.carbon.cassandra.dataaccess/3.2.1
>
> ../../components/cassandra/org.wso2.carbon.cassandra.server/3.2.1
>
> ../../components/cassandra/org.ws
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Denis Weerasiri wrote:
> So in the the current patch-releases/3.2.1/pom.xml, we have
> to explicitly define what the correct build sequence should be. This is
> gonna cause a lot of problems I guess.
>
I am not exactly sure, but I think maven resolves the dependen
So in the the current patch-releases/3.2.1/pom.xml, we have
to explicitly define what the correct build sequence should be. This is
gonna cause a lot of problems I guess.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Vijayaratha Vijayasingam wrote:
> This is the current order defined in the pom;
>
>
>
> ../..
Hi,
I'm getting following issue.;
[INFO] Installing org.wso2.carbon.ec2-client.feature.group 3.2.0.
[INFO] Installing org.wso2.carbon.deployment.synchronizer.feature.group
3.2.0.
[INFO] Installing
org.wso2.carbon.registry.community.features.server.feature.group 3.2.0.
[ERROR] Cannot complete the
This is the current order defined in the pom;
../../components/cassandra/org.wso2.carbon.cassandra.dataaccess/3.2.1
../../components/cassandra/org.wso2.carbon.cassandra.server/3.2.1
../../components/cassandra/org.wso2.carbon.cassandra.mgt.ui/3.2.1
*
../../features/cassandra/org.wso2.carbon.
Please, patch your JDK with "unlimited jurisdiction key strength policy files".
Thanks
AmilaJ
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Melan Nimesh wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> build fail at /home/carbontrunk/carbon/dependencies/wss4j/1.5.11-wso2v1/,
> please have a look
>
> log:
> [INFO] Scanning for projects...
>
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
> If we do a static subscription for the same topic with the same event sink
> url twice only one subscription is shown in the UI. Now if we delete the
> subscription shown in the UI other subscription is still there and cannot be
> dele
Hi,
Getting[1];
-Ratha.
p.s: please check 'cassandra' feature build order..
[1]
[INFO] Deleting
C:\Projects\branch\3.2.0\features\cassandra\org.wso2.carbon.cassandra.feature\3.2.1\
target
[INFO] [site:attach-descriptor {execution: default-attach-descriptor}]
[INFO] [carbon-p2:p2-feature-gen {exe
Can you check with standalone Tomcat 7.0.14?
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
> In AS when we invoke an in-only operation AS returns the following response
>
> HTTP/1.1 202 Accepted
> Content-Type: text/xml;charset=UTF-8
> Transfer-Encoding: chunked
> Date: Fri, 01 Jul
We have to look into this. May be a bug in Tomcat 7.0.14.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
> In AS when we invoke an in-only operation AS returns the following response
>
> HTTP/1.1 202 Accepted
> Content-Type: text/xml;charset=UTF-8
> Transfer-Encoding: chunked
> Date
30 matches
Mail list logo