Chamara Ishanni,
I suspect that this might be due to enabling of clustering, specifically,
state replication, amongst the AS nodes. This is because, once we restart
the AS instances, the throughput returns to normal. There is no need to
restart the LB, so the LB is behaving well. So, to test this
Now it is possible to configure load balancing autoscaling parameters
using a single configuration file [1]. The autoscaling configuration bits
are optional. The ServiceDynamicLoadbalanceEndpoint, Autoscale mediators
Autoscaler task all refer to the same config file. Synapse has a shortcoming
Hi,
These packs are available under following local builder location too.
http://10.100.1.43/~carbon/releases/carbon/3.2.1/2011-07-01/
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Supun Malinga sup...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
please note that this is with the revision 108711.
thanks,
On Fri, Jul 1,
Sure will do.
Thanks,
Chamara
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Chamara Ishanni,
I suspect that this might be due to enabling of clustering, specifically,
state replication, amongst the AS nodes. This is because, once we restart
the AS instances, the
Hi devs,
getting error when building carbon trunk with Rev. 108843
[INFO] Building Step2
[INFO]task-segment: [clean, install]
[INFO]
[INFO] [clean:clean {execution: default-clean}]
Downloading:
I realized $subject when removing unnecessary components files from the LB
product. Most of the stuff that comes from the Carbon core is not needed by
the LB, which means, we can identify a much more smaller Carbon kernel.
Let's fix this in the trunk.
--
*Afkham Azeez*
Director of Architecture;
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
I realized $subject when removing unnecessary components files from the LB
product. Most of the stuff that comes from the Carbon core is not needed by
the LB, which means, we can identify a much more smaller Carbon kernel.
Hi Supun,
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Supun Malinga sup...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Amila,
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Amila Suriarachchi am...@wso2.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Supun Malinga sup...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Please make sure you have added relative
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Supun Malinga sup...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Devs,
/patch-releases/3.2.1/pom.xml is getting harder to manage as lots of stuff
is being added. Hence we are going to change the structure as follows. So if
you are adding a service-stub, component, etc you have to add
Hi All,
I went ahead and committed the changes in r108855.
Thanks and Regards,
Harshana
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Saminda Wijeratne samin...@wso2.comwrote:
+1 for committing changes moving the build to maven3.
Saminda
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Chathuri Wimalasena
Yes, this looks good. But I'm concerned that this pom became so long and
complex. We wanted to keep the changes to a bare minimum, but the number of
changes is too high :-(
Sent from my phone
On Jul 2, 2011 7:49 PM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:54 PM,
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
I realized $subject when removing unnecessary components files from the
LB product. Most of the stuff that comes from the Carbon core is not needed
by the LB, which means, we can identify a much more smaller Carbon
Senaka
Shankar mentioned $subject. Isn't this sub-optimal? For instance, caching
will not reduce the load on the DB in the current implementation. Why has it
been implemented this way?
Sent from my phone
___
Carbon-dev mailing list
Hi amilam,
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Supun,
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Supun Malinga sup...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Amila,
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Amila Suriarachchi am...@wso2.comwrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Supun
Even stuff like user.core registry.core are not necessary for the LB. So,
the kernel should exclude most of these Bundestag.
Sent from my phone
On Jul 2, 2011 6:53 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
I realized $subject when removing unnecessary components files from the
LB
product.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Supun Malinga sup...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Devs,
/patch-releases/3.2.1/pom.xml is getting harder to manage as lots of stuff
is being added. Hence we are going to change the structure as follows. So if
you are adding a service-stub, component, etc you have to add
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Melan Nimesh me...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi devs,
getting error when building carbon trunk with Rev. 108843
[INFO] Building Step2
[INFO]task-segment: [clean, install]
[INFO]
[INFO]
+1
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Pradeep Fernando prad...@wso2.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Supun Malinga sup...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Devs,
/patch-releases/3.2.1/pom.xml is getting harder to manage as lots of
stuff
is being added. Hence we are going to change the structure
Hi All,
I believe now the transition is complete and now it is possible to build CS
with Maven 3.
Following are the things we've completed.
1. Tycho integration to build Eclipse plugins.
2. Introduced Tycho source plugin to generate source jars for Eclipse
plugins.
3. Moved entire set of
Hi devs,
I'll be adding 3.2.1 branch for datasource component and the feature to fix
https://wso2.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1208
Regards,
--
Prabath Abeysekara
Software Engineer
WSO2 Inc.
Email: praba...@wso2.com harsha...@wso2.com
Mobile: +94774171471
http://harshana05.blogspot.com/
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Anjana Fernando anj...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
There is a bit of a strange issue with the CarbonInitialJNDIContext based
implementation. The issue I got is like, after like service deployment and
all in a server like DSS or ESB, some of the JNDI lookups fail. For
What $subject mean?
Can I launch now from eclipse a remote wso2 server?
Saludos,
Ing. Jorge Infante Osorio.
J´Dpto Soluciones SOA.
CDAE.
Fac. 5.
UCI.
___
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev@wso2.org
Hi All,
We are going to do an improvement on $subject.
Currently 'Business Processes' category contains '*Processes*', '*Instances*',
*'Deployed Packages*' and *'Add BPEL*' as sub-categories.
New improvement suggests, to re-structure sub-category list as *'List*', '*
Add*' and '*Instances*'.
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Denis Weerasiri de...@wso2.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Melan Nimesh me...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi devs,
getting error when building carbon trunk with Rev. 108843
[INFO] Building Step2
[INFO]task-segment: [clean, install]
[INFO]
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Senaka
Shankar mentioned $subject. Isn't this sub-optimal? For instance, caching
will not reduce the load on the DB in the current implementation. Why has it
been implemented this way?
For the benefit of others who do not
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Sumedha Rubasinghe sume...@wso2.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Senaka
Shankar mentioned $subject. Isn't this sub-optimal? For instance, caching
will not reduce the load on the DB in the current implementation.
26 matches
Mail list logo
