Re: [Carbon-dev] The 3.2.2/1.5.2/.. components are stabilized.

2011-07-26 Thread Afkham Azeez
I'm wondering whether all 3.2.0 3.2.1 Carbon commits are in the trunk. I have not committed the ServiceDynamicLB autoscaling code, but this is just a matter of replacing all that code in trunk with the new code since I rewrote those. I wonder whether there are such uncommitted code in the 3.2.0

Re: [Carbon-dev] WSO2 Carbon Trunk Continuous Build has FAILED

2011-07-26 Thread Melan Nimesh
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Pradeep Fernando prad...@wso2.com wrote: Hi Greg team, Please find a solution for this build failure. Due to this build failure, we are running hudson builds without tests. Melan please work with greg team to get this done. Hi, changed pom.xml of

Re: [Carbon-dev] The 3.2.2/1.5.2/.. components are stabilized.

2011-07-26 Thread Muhammed Shariq
I haven't committed the landing pages to the trunk, but since these pages are supposes to updated outside our patching model etc I am wondering if it makes sense to add these to the trunk? On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote: I'm wondering whether all 3.2.0

Re: [Carbon-dev] The 3.2.2/1.5.2/.. components are stabilized.

2011-07-26 Thread Afkham Azeez
yeah, commit those anyway On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Muhammed Shariq sha...@wso2.com wrote: I haven't committed the landing pages to the trunk, but since these pages are supposes to updated outside our patching model etc I am wondering if it makes sense to add these to the trunk? On

Re: [Carbon-dev] The 3.2.2/1.5.2/.. components are stabilized.

2011-07-26 Thread Kathiravelu Pradeeban
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote: I'm wondering whether all 3.2.0 3.2.1 Carbon commits are in the trunk. I have not committed the ServiceDynamicLB autoscaling code, but this is just a matter of replacing all that code in trunk with the new code since I

Re: [Carbon-dev] The 3.2.2/1.5.2/.. components are stabilized.

2011-07-26 Thread Muhammed Shariq
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote: yeah, commit those anyway Committed ..! On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Muhammed Shariq sha...@wso2.com wrote: I haven't committed the landing pages to the trunk, but since these pages are supposes to updated outside

[Carbon-dev] Trunk's build fail at components/governance/org.wso2.carbon.governance.api

2011-07-26 Thread Melan Nimesh
Hi, $subject, even with wsdl4j 1.6.2.wso2v3, Greg team, please have a look, find the attached surefire-reports FYI [INFO] Building WSO2 Carbon - Governance Aggregator Module [INFO]task-segment: [clean, install] [INFO]

[Carbon-dev] The role of having remote registry url in registry mounting

2011-07-26 Thread Waruna Ranasinghe
Hi devs, When configuring registry mounts, the following configuration is used. remoteInstance *url=https://localhost:9443/registry* idregistryMount1/id dbConfigregistrymount/dbConfig readOnlyfalse/readOnly registryRoot//registryRoot /remoteInstance Can

Re: [Carbon-dev] Bad Checksum in Repository

2011-07-26 Thread David Carver
What I ended up doing was mirroring the repositories, and setting in the setting.xml file, a mirrorOf entry, that pointed back to our local Nexus repo, which had the checksum set to Warn. Dave On 07/26/2011 12:03 AM, Pradeep Fernando wrote: Hi, I too got this problem while migrating

[Carbon-dev] AS build failure in trunk

2011-07-26 Thread Rajika Kumarasiri
[INFO] [assembly:attached {execution: 4-dist}] [INFO] Reading assembly descriptor: /home/rajika/projects/carbon/trunk/products/as/modules/distribution/product/src/assembly/bin.xml [INFO] Reading assembly descriptor:

Re: [Carbon-dev] How are we going to handle carbon.platform.patch.version property for 3.2.2 patch release

2011-07-26 Thread Supun Malinga
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Supun Malinga sup...@wso2.com wrote: Hi, On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Isuru Suriarachchi is...@wso2.comwrote: On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Supun Malinga sup...@wso2.com wrote: