Shall we have a test metric defined in a google doc and keep track of
what to be done etc through that test matrix?
--Srinath
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Charitha Kankanamge wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Krishantha Samaraweera
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Srinath,
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 20,
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Krishantha Samaraweera <
krishan...@wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi Srinath,
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Srinath Perera wrote:
>
>> Thanks Krishantha!!
>>
>> How good are we with test coverage (including introps and perf)? Can
>> you send the current status and pl
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Muhammed Shariq wrote:
> Hi Krishantha et al,
>
> If I am not mistaken we are running these test for products only right, at
> the moment? How about the possibility of running these test on the stratos
> services too ? I had a chat with Dhrashana and we most of th
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Muhammed Shariq wrote:
> Hi Krishantha et al,
>
> If I am not mistaken we are running these test for products only right, at
> the moment? How about the possibility of running these test on the stratos
> services too ? I had a chat with Dhrashana and we most of th
Hi all,
I came across with this issue when running the GReg testng
SecurityVetification test case as it invokes
the org.wso2.carbon.integration.secverifier.SecurityVerifierService.
There was a NPE as axis2 MessageContext gets null.
This can be reproduced when you manually drop a service aar to
G
Excellent thoughts Shariq. Integration tests for Stratos are essential. I
guess what we should do is, do a full build, run the Stratos setup script,
create tenants, run some tenant management tests, run some tenant specific
tests, platform sample test etc.
Please consult your MC on working with th
Hi Srinath,
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Srinath Perera wrote:
> Thanks Krishantha!!
>
> How good are we with test coverage (including introps and perf)? Can
> you send the current status and plan to cover other products?
>
As I mentioned in the earlier mail, there were few issue with Ravan
Hi
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Maninda Edirisooriya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In Mashup server existing test cases are migrated to TestNG. New test
> cases are added to host objects and completed. All patches applied to Jira
> are [1], [2], [3] and [4].
>
> [1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12
Please talk to the respective people & make sure that the patches get
committed ASAP.
Thanks
Azeez
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Afkham Azeez wrote:
> Folks, how is this progressing? I didn't see many updates during the past
> couple of weeks. Some products are still being built without inte
Hi,
In Mashup server existing test cases are migrated to TestNG. New test cases
are added to host objects and completed. All patches applied to Jira are
[1], [2], [3] and [4].
[1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12218
[2] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12229
[3] https://wso2.org/jira/bro
Hi
All the tests in DSS has been committed to the trunk.
Thanks
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Achala Aponso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> All the GS Tests are completed and committed to the trunk. (User
> management, gadget repository, Theme, Dashboard).
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Afkham Azee
Hi,
For BAM, there are some important fixes that should go to trunk. Applied
the patch in JIRA [1], [2], [3].
All failing tests are fixed and i checked locally in my machine. The
updated patch for the TestNG migration is attached on [4].
[1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12184
[2] https:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:51 AM, KasunG Gajasinghe wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Isuru Suriarachchi wrote:
>
>> From AS, KasunG has completed tests for all security scenarios and those
>> are already committed into trunk. Now he's working on RM, Secure RM
>> scenarios.
>
>
Excell
Hi,
All the GS Tests are completed and committed to the trunk. (User
management, gadget repository, Theme, Dashboard).
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Afkham Azeez wrote:
> Folks, how is this progressing? I didn't see many updates during the past
> couple of weeks. Some products are still bein
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Isuru Suriarachchi wrote:
> From AS, KasunG has completed tests for all security scenarios and those
> are already committed into trunk. Now he's working on RM, Secure RM
> scenarios.
Yes, thanks Isuru for the update. I've added a patch for Reliable Messaging
ju
Hi Hiranya,
In synapse-core/API class, we set the API name to message context after the
message is processed by handlers. So at the moment, API name is not
available to handlers.
But for handlers like BasicAuth and OAuth, it is required to get the API
name at the handler level. So shall we set th
Hi all,
I am working on migrating Carbon Studio's registry browser from Remote
Registry API to Web Service API.
At the moment, It works fine for most cases such as listing resources,
adding collections, setting resources permissions
but for adding new resources and getting resource content,
it's
Hi Krishantha et al,
If I am not mistaken we are running these test for products only right, at
the moment? How about the possibility of running these test on the stratos
services too ? I had a chat with Dhrashana and we most of the tests that
covers multitenancy aspect, so its a matter of setting
Hi Nirmal,
As per your suggestion I have committed this patch to trunk, can you please
patch to this jar in you local setup and verify it works fine?
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Nirmal Fernando wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Muhammed Shariq wrote:
> > Hi Nirmal,
> >
> > The "L
Hi Folks,
What is the proper way to do this inside a handler ?
Thanks,
Thilina
--
Thilina Buddhika
Associate Technical Lead
WSO2 Inc. ; http://wso2.com
lean . enterprise . middleware
phone : +94 77 44 88 727
blog : http://blog.thilinamb.com
___
Carbo
>From AS, KasunG has completed tests for all security scenarios and those
are already committed into trunk. Now he's working on RM, Secure RM
scenarios.
Thanks,
~Isuru
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Afkham Azeez wrote:
> Folks, how is this progressing? I didn't see many updates during the pas
Folks, how is this progressing? I didn't see many updates during the past
couple of weeks. Some products are still being built without integration
tests.
--
Afkham Azeez
Sent from my phone
___
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev@wso2.org
http://mail.wso2.
Thanks Krishantha!!
How good are we with test coverage (including introps and perf)? Can
you send the current status and plan to cover other products?
Did we start running Bamboo again since this is fixed?
Do we run introps and perf tests with this?
--Srinath
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:28 AM,
Framework users maven as the builder. Hence, it uses dependencies relevant
to carbon version under test. Support for multiple carbon versions will be
a good additions to the framework. When consider test architecture, having
support for multiple carbon versions, will add extra complexity to
the fra
Hi Kris,
I was wondering whether there is a possibility of testing different carbon
versions of products, such as ESB 3.0.1 with BAM 2.0.0?
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Krishantha Samaraweera <
krishan...@wso2.com> wrote:
> We need to monitor how this works for few days.
> If everything run
We need to monitor how this works for few days.
If everything runs smoothly then we can enable test failure notifications.
Thanks,
Krishantha.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Krishantha Samaraweera <
krishan...@wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have done the $subject on Bamboo machine and it is wo
Hi,
We have done the $subject on Bamboo machine and it is working. You can find
the last successful test build at [1].
Test framework has been configured to use packs generated by trunk build.
The test setup consists of five products (ESB, G-Reg, AS, BPS and DSS) with
registry mounts on top of My
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Muhammed Shariq wrote:
> Hi Nirmal,
>
> The "LandingPage" attribute is not obsolete, in fact we introduced this in
> order to prevent users being redirected to the login page (IS) when a tenant
> first access a service.
Thanks Shariq for the explanation. It seems
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Dinusha Senanayaka wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We are going to develop a ESB mediator which can be shipped as a feature
> and once this feature is installed within ESB, the DS mediator can be used
> to make data services calls in-line, without making actual SOAP requests,
Hi CS, devs
I have added the Working sets support into CS core framework So Now by
default working set UI composite appears in the project
but you have to call following method within " performFinish() " method
in the project creation wizard class
projectModel.addToWorkingSet(iproject);
Hi Denis,
We can't just point to the ODE branch.
There are some features (i.e. BPEL extensions) added by us which are not in
Apache ODE
Anyway it is good to have a released version rather than a random revision.
Therefore, lets get the latest released version of Apache ODE and try to
migrate the
Wherever you are reusing a stub or service client, you should ensure thread
safety. So yes, if you are calling stub.getId() from multiple threads, you
need to ensure that this call happens within a properly synchronized block.
A further design enhancement could include maintaining a pool of stubs,
I see. So should i synchronize the initiliazation part which calls a new
instance of stub?
Also the method call of the stub instance like stub.getId() should also be
synchronized?
Thanks
>Please note that by design, Axis2 clients & stubs are not thread safe. You
will have to handle the synch
No update in "org.wso2.carbon.service.mgt.stub" module...it is built...
-Ratha
On 19 January 2012 13:22, Tharindu Mathew wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you please go check whether the service mgt stub is built/ changed?
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Vijayaratha Vijayasingam > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
34 matches
Mail list logo
