On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Ruwan Linton wrote:
> +1
>
> I think we shouldn't let users store sequences, endpoints and stuff into
> the local,
It seems most are in favor of not allowing the user to store stuff into the
local repo. In that case we can leave it out of the picture. As Senaka
+1
I think we shouldn't let users store sequences, endpoints and stuff into
the local, even giving the option to store sequences, endpoints into the
config registry is not useful, because we are anyway saving stuff into
the config registry, but having this enabled for config registry has
only
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> With registry separation work shaping up we need to rethink how we are
> going to handle dynamic sequences and endpoints in the ESB. Earlier users
> were able to save sequences and endpoints anywhere in the registry and re
