Re: [Carbon-dev] Identity component build fails in trunk due to axiom version mismatch

2011-01-10 Thread Prabath Abeysekera
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote: > Wondering whether it would be better to come up with a single parent POM > for all of the platform (core, dependencies, components, orbit, products, > and features), which will contain Maven Properties of all dependencies etc, > and inher

Re: [Carbon-dev] Identity component build fails in trunk due to axiom version mismatch

2011-01-10 Thread Supun Malinga
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Kathiravelu Pradeeban wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote: > >> Wondering whether it would be better to come up with a single parent POM >> for all of the platform (core, dependencies, components, orbit, products, >> and features)

Re: [Carbon-dev] Identity component build fails in trunk due to axiom version mismatch

2011-01-10 Thread Kathiravelu Pradeeban
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote: > Wondering whether it would be better to come up with a single parent POM > for all of the platform (core, dependencies, components, orbit, products, > and features), which will contain Maven Properties of all dependencies etc, > and inher

Re: [Carbon-dev] Identity component build fails in trunk due to axiom version mismatch

2011-01-10 Thread Senaka Fernando
Wondering whether it would be better to come up with a single parent POM for all of the platform (core, dependencies, components, orbit, products, and features), which will contain Maven Properties of all dependencies etc, and inherit them in child POMs? WDYT? Thanks, Senaka. On Mon, Jan 10, 2011

[Carbon-dev] Identity component build fails in trunk due to axiom version mismatch

2011-01-10 Thread Amila Maha Arachchi
Hi, $Subject. axiom.wso2.version in component/pom.xml is 1.2.11.wso2v1 But in orbit/axiom/pom.xml it is 1.2.10.wso2v1 Had to change the component/pom.xml to 1.2.10.wsov1 to get the build done. Which value is wrong from the above two? I saw a mail thread discussing something related to this rece