Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

Milinda Pathirage wrote: > Hi Identity Server Team, > > there are some svn externals in identity carbon features which has svn > externals to old locations. Please update those. Done. Thanks & regards. -Prabath > > thanks > Milinda > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Waruna Ranasinghe

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

Hi Identity Server Team, there are some svn externals in identity carbon features which has svn externals to old locations. Please update those. thanks Milinda On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Waruna Ranasinghe wrote: > Please remove the svn external to Carbon platform from Identity product (

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

Please remove the svn external to Carbon platform from Identity product (in Carbon 2.0.3 branch) too. Thanks, Waruna On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Waruna Ranasinghe wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Lahiru Gunathilake wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Waruna R

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Lahiru Gunathilake wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Waruna Ranasinghe wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Please remove the svn external to Carbon platform from Governance product. >> > From where ? I mean which Governance product branch ? > in 2.0.3 > > Lahiru

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Waruna Ranasinghe wrote: > Hi, > > Please remove the svn external to Carbon platform from Governance product. > >From where ? I mean which Governance product branch ? Lahiru > > Thanks, > Waruna > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Ruchira Wageesha wrote: > >>

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

Hi, Please remove the svn external to Carbon platform from Governance product. Thanks, Waruna On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Ruchira Wageesha wrote: > Mashup Server branch works :-) > > ___ > Carbon-dev mailing list > Carbon-dev@wso2.org > https://

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

Mashup Server branch works :-) ___ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Milinda Pathirage wrote: > >> Hi Devs, >> >> Carbon 2.0.3 branching work is almost finish now. the only remaining thing >> is get products to work with new branch. I finished migrating BPS to new >> bra

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Milinda Pathirage wrote: > Hi Devs, > > Carbon 2.0.3 branching work is almost finish now. the only remaining thing > is get products to work with new branch. I finished migrating BPS to new > branch and it is working fine with new branch. Can all of you please crea

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

Hi Devs, Carbon 2.0.3 branching work is almost finish now. the only remaining thing is get products to work with new branch. I finished migrating BPS to new branch and it is working fine with new branch. Can all of you please create the branch for your products(I am creating IS and GREG branches a

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

I have done a mistake when creating the branch. Carbon directory inside the 2.0.3 branch should be renamed to 'core'. I'm going to rename the 'carbon' directory inside the 2.0.3 branch to 'core' at 12:00 AM LK Time today. Please do not commit anything until I send a confirmation. Thanks Milinda O

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

Hi Milinda, On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Milinda Pathirage wrote: > Hi Product Teams, > > I have created 2.0.3 branch here[1]. Still there are work to be done to > migrate it to new svn structure. In new svn structure products also goes > inside the branch[2]. Can you guys reply to this mail

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

It is ok to remove the eclipse related files. Yes for the proxy-editor and ep-editors the 2.0.2.1 needs to be in 2.0.3 since there are some bug fixes. Saminda On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Ruwan Linton wrote: > Milinda Pathirage wrote: > > There are .settings directories and .classpath, .proj

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

Sameera Jayasoma wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Milinda Pathirage > wrote: > > There was a svn external to carbon-platform in BPS 1.1.0 branch, > because at that time products were in separate location. I fixed that. > > I think we can move axis2,

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Milinda Pathirage wrote: > There was a svn external to carbon-platform in BPS 1.1.0 branch, because at > that time products were in separate location. I fixed that. > > I think we can move axis2, ode, synapse, rampart, sandesha, rhino, wss4j, > savan, xmlsec, trans

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

There was a svn external to carbon-platform in BPS 1.1.0 branch, because at that time products were in separate location. I fixed that. I think we can move axis2, ode, synapse, rampart, sandesha, rhino, wss4j, savan, xmlsec, transports in to one top level directory because most of them are apache

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

Milinda, I checked out this branch. Why do I see a carbon-platform directory inside products/bps/1.1.1?? Given that its already in 2.0.3/, that's redundant isn't it? Also, why is there so much "pollution" at the top level?? Can we nor organize a bit more to have a cleaner top level structure? San

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

Hi Milinda, Please find G-Reg 3.0.2 at [1]. The next patch release version for G-Reg is 3.0.3. [1] https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/branches/solutions/governance/3.0.2. Thanks, Senaka. On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Thilina Mahesh Buddhika wrote: > Hi, > > Please find the IS latest branch(2.0.

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

Hi, Please find the IS latest branch(2.0.2) here [1]. Next patch release version for IS is 2.0.3. thanks. /thilina [1] - https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/branches/solutions/identity/2.0.2/product On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Milinda Pathirage wrote: > I am still testing the build. We'll be able to build QA packs tomorrow > onwards. Good! I am looking to get someone other than Lahiru to take care of building this time around. If there are any volunteers, reveal yourselves :) Samisa.

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

I am still testing the build. We'll be able to build QA packs tomorrow onwards. Thanks Milinda On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > Are we done with branching for 2.0.3? Can we start building QA packs from > that? > > Samisa... > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Milin

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

Milinda Pathirage wrote: > There are .settings directories and .classpath, .project files in some > of the esb ui components. Is it ok to remove those from the svn. Not sure, whether they are required for the tooling people... Saminda/Chathuri?? (I guess these are on the tooling components) Thanks

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

Are we done with branching for 2.0.3? Can we start building QA packs from that? Samisa... On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Milinda Pathirage wrote: > I moved 2.0.2.1 code to 2.0.3 directory. Now we don't have any 2.0.2.1 in > 2.0.3 branch. When you are fixing stuff in 2.0.2.1 please commit the

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

I moved 2.0.2.1 code to 2.0.3 directory. Now we don't have any 2.0.2.1 in 2.0.3 branch. When you are fixing stuff in 2.0.2.1 please commit them to 2.0.3 also. Thanks Milinda On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Milinda Pathirage wrote:

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

There are .settings directories and .classpath, .project files in some of the esb ui components. Is it ok to remove those from the svn. Thanks Milinda On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Milinda Pathirage wrote: > >> Hi Senaka, >> >> 2.

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Milinda Pathirage wrote: > Hi Senaka, > > 2.0.2.1 is inside 2.0.2 branch. When I created new branch from 2.0.2 they > were there. What I need to know is how we handle this in new branch. The > best option is to copy 2.0.2.1 code into 2.0.3, but I am not sure wheth

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

Hi Senaka, 2.0.2.1 is inside 2.0.2 branch. When I created new branch from 2.0.2 they were there. What I need to know is how we handle this in new branch. The best option is to copy 2.0.2.1 code into 2.0.3, but I am not sure whether those 2.0.2.1 components are complete or not. If they are not comp

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

Hi Milinda, On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Milinda Pathirage wrote: > Hi devs, > > We are done with most part of the migration to new svn structure. But we > have some carbon components with 2.0.2.1 version. Is it ok to change their > versions to 2.0.3. Are you done with the 2.0.2.1 version of

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

Hi devs, We are done with most part of the migration to new svn structure. But we have some carbon components with 2.0.2.1 version. Is it ok to change their versions to 2.0.3. Are you done with the 2.0.2.1 version of components? Do 2.0.2 has completed code for 2.0.2.1 version of those components?

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

*Mashup Server* Latest Product Branch: https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/branches/mashup/java/2.0.1/product Next Patch Release Version: 2.0.2 I will add Gadget Server once 1.0.0 is done. thanks, Tyrell On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Milinda Pathirage wrote: > Hi Product Teams, > > I have crea

Re: [Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

Hi Product Teams, I have created 2.0.3 branch here[1]. Still there are work to be done to migrate it to new svn structure. In new svn structure products also goes inside the branch[2]. Can you guys reply to this mail with the latest product branch locations to be included in to this new location.

[Carbon-dev] Time for 2.0.3

We need to start working on the next patch release, now that 2.0.3 is done. We will solely concentrate on bug fixes for 2.0.3. In the mean time, 3.0.0 work will continue on the trunk. Minlinda is working on creating the branch. Once the branch is cut, please commit all your fixes in there, in add