+1.
In fact even now the broker architecture is neat but having to support
multiple protocol versions has made it little sloppy. On a side note I
suggest you involve personally in 1.0 design/review work to get it right.
Danushka
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
> Danushka
Danushka
My main thought right now is that we need to move to 1.0 support for the
standard. I think one of the issues with Qpid - and I may be wrong - is
that the changing set of specs has meant too many updates to the core. I'd
love to see some stability around 1.0 and maybe even a plan to depre
Hi Paul,
Yes that I've heard.
My concern was OOM issues. The ones we identified and submitted patches for
were mainly at the transport/session layer and had nothing to do with the
underlying data store. Also as I understand the Cassandra store is for
broker scaling (?).
Robbie has done lots of c
Danushka
Thanks! We'll take a look. We have also been trying out a Cassandra store
if you are interested.
Paul
On 31 October 2011 06:01, Danushka Menikkumbura <
danushka.menikkumb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apparently Robbie has done certain changes to the broker which claim to
> have fixed
