Sorry to also chime in on an old thread but I've just been trying to
upgrade to the latest cas-management overlay today and ran into similar
issues.
For the issue where *existing* services weren't showing up it might be
incorrect permissions on the git repo that is automatically generated in
t
Thanks Pablo, but yes I have. It never gets to the response however since
there are not authentication handlers that expect the password grant's
combination of client_id:client_secret and username:password.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 3:09 PM Pablo Vidaurri wrote:
> Did you try adding a supportedRes
Did you try adding a supportedResponseTypes value to your service config:
"supportedResponseTypes": [ "java.util.HashSet", [ "code", "token" ] ]
-psv
On Wednesday, June 17, 2020 at 5:20:15 PM UTC-5, Gary Rush wrote:
>
> I've gone through several simple example service configurations for both
Using Cas 6.1.x, I have Oauth2 working with client credentials grant type.
I dont see any documentation on defining a scope in the service config. I'm
sure there must be a way.
How can I define a scope for client_credentials type for a given serviceId?
Thanks.
-psv
--
- Website: https://aper
Hi José,
Since Tomcat 9.03x and AJP v1.3, if I am correct, the AJP connector needs
to have the Secret declared in it as in here:
Could it be that you should simply replace
cas.server.tomcat.ajp.attributes.secret = isasecret
with
cas.server.tomcat.ajp.attributes.requiredSecret = isasecret
I was
Good afternoon group,
I have been for some time, more than desired being honest, trying to deploy
a CAS server in my organization on a cluster Kubernetes and I think I have
almost succeeded.
The truth is that if I had previously known how difficult it has been, I
will not get on the boat. Prev
It looks like 3.1.7 is no longer available.
https://packages.atlassian.com/webapp/#/search/quick/eyJzZWFyY2giOiJxdWljayIsInF1ZXJ5IjoicGxhdGZvcm0ifQ==
Do you want to build the cas client or just use it?
Ray
On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 22:45 -0700, 더미 wrote:
Notice: This message was sent from outside th
Guys,
thanks a lot for all your awesome answers. Switching to the front channel
mechanism solved the issue for us. But I am happy about the possible
fallbacks in case we have to switch back to the back channel.
Cheers,
Paul
On Wednesday, June 17, 2020 at 6:29:46 PM UTC+2 pascal...@univ-paris1
