[cas-user] Getting Ldap attributes

2011-02-22 Thread Laura Griffel
Hello everyone, I'm trying to get CAS up and running. Authentication works fine, but my client application needs to get a user's ldap groups. I added a CredentialsToLDAPAttributePrincipalResolver to my authentication manager, and on the client side I added the Saml11TicketValidationFilter. I

Re: [cas-user] missing org.opensaml:opensaml:1.1b:pom

2011-02-22 Thread Scott Battaglia
CAS4 is actually using OpenSAML2. I haven't actually tested the support yet that I wrote (I need to write unit tests tonight). *If* everything works okay I can attempt to backport it. Though note that OpenSAML2 isn't in the public Maven repository (other than the ones someone else put in there)

Re: [cas-user] missing org.opensaml:opensaml:1.1b:pom

2011-02-22 Thread Marvin Addison
> I think that having one of a security product's dependency as > unsupported is a pretty big deal and shouldn't be marginalized. While you're right in theory, in practice it's hardly as dire as marginalization. The lines of communication between the Shib and CAS projects are open and working. (

Re: [cas-user] missing org.opensaml:opensaml:1.1b:pom

2011-02-22 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Marvin Addison wrote: >> Now that 3.4.6 is out the door, congratulations, will we see an update >> to the supported version of SAML? Thanks! > > It's certainly not reasonable to move to SAML 2 in CAS 3.4.x.  While Ok, that makes sense. I know that CAS

Re: [cas-user] missing org.opensaml:opensaml:1.1b:pom

2011-02-22 Thread Marvin Addison
> Now that 3.4.6 is out the door, congratulations, will we see an update > to the supported version of SAML? Thanks! It's certainly not reasonable to move to SAML 2 in CAS 3.4.x. While it may be feasible to move to the SAML 2.x libs and use the SAML 1.1 support therein, there seems marginal value

Re: [cas-user] missing org.opensaml:opensaml:1.1b:pom

2011-02-22 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Ping. :-) On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 5:03 PM, wrote: > > Thanks for the clarification. We'll also hopefully be migrating to 2 sometime > soon. > > -Original Message- > From: Brent Putman > > Also, be aware that as of June 30, 2010, OpenSAML 1.x will be in a > wholly unsupported status (as