I can run jasper to build rfsoc4x2_tut_rfdc_real.slx <https://github.com/casper-astro/tutorials_devel/blob/main/rfsoc/tut_rfdc/rfsoc4x2_tut_rfdc_real.slx> and rfsoc4x2_tut_spec.slx <https://github.com/casper-astro/tutorials_devel/blob/main/rfsoc/tut_spec/rfsoc4x2/rfsoc4x2_tut_spec.slx> examples into .fpg and .dtbo files, and they work. However, if I rename the .slx file or copy it to a new file to make changes, it still builds, but the ADC only returns -1.
When I say ANY changes to the .slx make the ADC return all -1, this has been reduced to even trivial things: * renaming the .slx files with mv * copying an .slx file to a new name with cp * Save As within simulink * copying and pasting the .slx contents into a new file This is an embarrassing and trivial-sounding issue, but I don't understand enough about simulink or Model Composer to understand how this could be. Is there a filename check or checksum buried in some block in these .slx files or some casperfpga init code? I can't find any. I've also failed in a similar way with the rfdc when trying to build up "by hand" any project with the RFDC yellow block, including the RFDC tutorial #2 <https://casper-toolflow.readthedocs.io/projects/tutorials/en/latest/tutorials/rfsoc/tut_rfdc.html> . In case it's relevant I'm using all of the recommended versions: * Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS (in a Virtual Box virtual machine) * Matlab R2021a * Vivado 2021.1 * casperfpga branch py38 (not mega-merge as suggested on Getting Started <https://casper-toolflow.readthedocs.io/projects/tutorials/en/latest/tutorials/rfsoc/tut_getting_started.html> ) * mlib_devel branch m2021a Thanks, Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "casper@lists.berkeley.edu" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to casper+unsubscr...@lists.berkeley.edu. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/lists.berkeley.edu/d/msgid/casper/f4208d93-23e7-4471-a887-177b1fa8c1b9n%40lists.berkeley.edu.