On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Jonathan Ellis<jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's really outside our scope here. Anyone who wants to write docs > in a non-English language is welcome to start another thread to > discuss terminology in that language, but we shouldn't hold up the > canonical English docs for that.
+1 > > -Jonathan > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Wilson Mar<wilson...@gmail.com> wrote: >> This is a good discussion. >> >> I would like to add that whatever English names we end up with we >> should also get non-English versions of those words as part of our >> process. >> >> I say process because there may be a perfect word in Hebrew, Nigerian, >> or other language we can borrow that implies the perfect nuance we >> need. >> >> We are expecting great things from this technology, so having >> translations of the key words from the get-go would help toward >> quicker wider world-wide adoption. >> >> - Wilson Mar >> > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
