What happened about 20h in to make the latency drop so dramatically?
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Huming Wu wrote:
> I did some performance test and I am not impressed :). The data set is
> 880K unique keys and there are 4 columns with 2 columns being string
> and the other 2 are integers (fr
did you set the root to INFO instead DEBUG in log4j.properties?
2009/8/18 Huming Wu
> > What sort of slicing are you doing? This will impact CPU usage.
>
> The slice is all columns (under one column family which is Standard1):
>List cols = thriftClient_.get_slice
> ("Table1",
>
>
> What sort of slicing are you doing? This will impact CPU usage.
The slice is all columns (under one column family which is Standard1):
List cols = thriftClient_.get_slice ("Table1",
myKey,
new ColumnParent("Standard1",null),
What sort of slicing are you doing? This will impact CPU usage.
Michael
Huming Wu wrote:
> I did some performance test and I am not impressed :). The data set is
> 880K unique keys and there are 4 columns with 2 columns being string
> and the other 2 are integers (from client side, to the backen
I did some performance test and I am not impressed :). The data set is
880K unique keys and there are 4 columns with 2 columns being string
and the other 2 are integers (from client side, to the backend it is
all byte[]). After high throughput set (very fast), 220MB are injected
via batch_insert. I
