It's also worth singling out CASSANDRA-675 for your "scale up"
scenario -- latency overhead per node is much lower in 0.5.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Thanks for posting your results; it is an interesting read and we are
> pleased to beat HBase in most workloads. :)
>
Thanks for posting your results; it is an interesting read and we are
pleased to beat HBase in most workloads. :)
Since you originally benchmarked 0.4.2, you might be interested in the
speed gains in 0.5. A couple graphs here:
http://spyced.blogspot.com/2010/01/cassandra-05.html
0.6 (beta in a f
Hi folks,
We have been conducting a performance study comparing Cassandra and HBase (and
Yahoo! PNUTS and MySQL) on identical hardware under identical workloads. Our
focus has been on serving workloads (e.g. read and write individual records,
rather than scan a whole table for MapReduce.) This
