whoops, ignore my fix. I found my fix to be incomplete. Elements with anonymous
types still have to be generated. I need to look further at this one thursday.
sorry about that,
Dean
Dean Hiller wrote:
Generation from attached schema generates code that doesn't compile if
the type method
Generation from attached schema generates code that doesn't compile if
the type method is used to generate the code. It generates a class that
inherits from itself. I found this can be fixed by changing line 1161
in SourceGenerator(inside function createClasses(Schema, SGStateInfo)
from
while(str
Hello,
I am having problems when update a relationship
beetwen two Objects. The updates do not have effects.
What can is happening?
Thanks,
Fabio
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Información de Estados Unidos y América Latina, en Yahoo! Noticias.
Visít
Hi Arnaud,
Ok, I will try with the latest CVS code.Wish you all there a very Happy, Healthy, Safe and Prosperous New Year.
Regards,Vinay.
Original Message Follows
From: "Arnaud Blandin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [castor-dev]
Ok, I think I understand, but I think there may still be a small bug.
Maybe we want the line changed from
if((!type.isEnumerated()) && jType.isPrimitive())
to
if((!type.isEnumerated()) && jType.isPrimitive() && !isRequired())
The reason I ask is in the attached schema, there is a required field
thanks Rhett, Arnaud, I didn't know this functionality existed.
Dean
Rhett Sutphin wrote:
Hi Dean,
This functionality is implied by the binding file schema, though I
haven't tried it. To do what you want, it looks like you'd do
something like this:
...
Abstract
.
Hi Simon,
You can use the 'type' method for generating the classes. For more
information, please take a look at:
http://www.castor.org/sourcegen.html#Class-Creation/Mapping
Bear in mind that castor generates Java classes to represent the
hierarchy defined in your XML Schema so if you have defined
