Bernd,
can I please see the complete stack trace ? Iow, does it happen on the
db.update(order) or db.update(customer) ? In addition, I am asking myself
whether what you describe is a valid use of Castor anyhow ? For 1:M relationships to
work, to my knowledge, you need to be able to traverse th
Hi,
I am not sure wether my construct can be done with castor jdo, so let
me explain:
Lets say we have a customer table and an order table. Every order has
one customer associated, so we have a one-to-many mapping.
This works fine.
For some reason I want to have a field (column) in customer t
Hi,
I got one step further. I'm having a little bit more information in my xml-file
now but still not all individual elements of my ArrayList are saved and the
attributes of the element are not saved, too.
The xml-file looks now so.
-
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; />
^
Entit
It seems that I resolved problem in my case:
After putting few logging lines in castor source I found that something is
wrong with mapping.
There was "extends" declaration in mapping file without mapping for extended
class being provided. 0.9.3.21 was tollerable to this mistake. After
removing "e
Hi Keith,
It worked. I get all attributes now.
But the field "ObjectkindName" is not ignored. What can I do about that?
Actually, I don't even have declared this attribute (field) in my javacode. It
is just a public String getObjectkindName()-method.
Katja
>
> Hi Katja,
>
> You mapping for the
Hi,
Instead of blanking out the value, remove it. (I wish that an empty, blank, value
would be signalled as missing but it doesn't. You have to remove the tag. Also, if you
remove the tag but there's a default value in your XSD... hasXXX() still returns false
whereas it should return true :-(
