Re: [castor-dev] Easier way to configure castor...

2004-06-22 Thread Keith Visco
Hi Nick, I've added it to the xml-faq. --Keith Nick Stuart wrote: > > This is all great information to have. > Do you suppose you could add some of the missing parts into the website > under the configuration section. Mainly, the order in which it looks for > properties, being able to program

Re: [castor-dev] Estimated time of next release

2004-06-22 Thread Keith Visco
Hi Tomasz, We'll get that estimate updated soon. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thanks, --Keith Tomasz Piontek wrote: > > Hi, > > According to the web page the time of the next release was estimated to > 7th June. > > > >Next Release > > >Next scheduled release (0.9.6): June, 7 2004 (tentati

Re: [castor-dev] Current CVS head...

2004-06-22 Thread Gregory Block
On 22 Jun 2004, at 20:42, Nick Stuart wrote: Doesn't it make sense that a read-only sql field would still need a set method? Let me clarify the situation I've got on my side...: While we do have a single file responsible for db reading/writing of an object, there's a feed system in place that allo

Re: [castor-dev] Easier way to configure castor...

2004-06-22 Thread Nick Stuart
This is all great information to have. Do you suppose you could add some of the missing parts into the website under the configuration section. Mainly, the order in which it looks for properties, being able to programmatically overwrite properties (I realize a good read through the API will get thi

Re: [castor-dev] Easier way to configure castor...

2004-06-22 Thread Keith Visco
Jay is correct, Castor loads the castor.properties in the following order: 1. From classpath (usually from the jar file) 2. From {java.home}/lib (if present) 3. From the local working directory Each one overrides the previous. So you don't have to come up with a properties file with all the pr

Re: [castor-dev] Current CVS head...

2004-06-22 Thread Nick Stuart
Quick comment inline... -Nick ---Original Message- --From: Gregory Block [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 3:10 PM --To: Castor Developers --Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Current CVS head... -- -- --On 22 Jun 2004, at 19:39, Werner Guttmann wrote: -- --> Thanks .. ;-)

Re: [castor-dev] Current CVS head...

2004-06-22 Thread Werner Guttmann
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:10:15 +0100, Gregory Block wrote: > >On 22 Jun 2004, at 19:39, Werner Guttmann wrote: > >> Thanks .. ;-). Btw, if you've got specific questions to code in HEAD, >> let me know ... > >Actually, I've taken umbrage with some of the code in >util.Configuration - I'll hand bac

Re: [castor-dev] Current CVS head...

2004-06-22 Thread Gregory Block
On 22 Jun 2004, at 19:39, Werner Guttmann wrote: Thanks .. ;-). Btw, if you've got specific questions to code in HEAD, let me know ... Actually, I've taken umbrage with some of the code in util.Configuration - I'll hand back a patch shortly and attach it to the bug that is listed in bugzilla alr

Re: [castor-dev] Current CVS head...

2004-06-22 Thread Werner Guttmann
Gregory, please see inline ... Werner On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 09:48:23 +0100, Gregory Block wrote: > >I've just done a deploy of HEAD to our staging servers last week, and >have been running it through its paces to see how it behaves. > >First, the good news - it looks very good. Haven't run in

Re: [castor-dev] Easier way to configure castor...

2004-06-22 Thread Werner Guttmann
Claude, in the light of all these arguments, can I please ask you to visit http://bugzilla.exolab.org and open an enhancement request (a bug report categorized as enhancement request) so that you and we can trace progress and discuss required features in a more structured manner. Nick, and I d

[castor-dev] Current CVS head...

2004-06-22 Thread Gregory Block
I've just done a deploy of HEAD to our staging servers last week, and have been running it through its paces to see how it behaves. First, the good news - it looks very good. Haven't run into any operational issues - the things that worked then work now, and work predictably and reliably. No