Just a thought,
put it in a string in a stringstream and unmarshall multiple objects from it. I'm not
sure if this works or gives an exception if it meets the second . If it does
you'll have to split it "by hand". Good luck.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
I just talked,
We have a packet filter that only allows for passive ftp. If you use a browser or set
passive mode, you'll be allright.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jpjansen@;snow.nl]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM
To: Hoogland Daan
Subject: Re: FW: [castor-
I'll talk to the admin:-(
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:Erik.Ostermueller@;alltel.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [castor-dev] the reverse of XMLInstance2Schema
>
>
> Daan,
>
> I'm having trouble downloade
H Eitan,
> where can i find out more about daan's gui generator?
try ftp://ftp.snow.nl/pub/castor
there are some archives there, no documentation. One of the archives contains a
patched castor. The others example applications.
I will try to continue put in the odd hour a week, but can't guarant
H Bill,
Your element is oneof and your class TEST1. Are you sure they are a match?
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Laird [mailto:willydog66@;hotmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 6:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [castor-dev] Validation exception with default code
> g
Did you run "ant run" or from the command line? When you send your version it worked
with my settings as well but only when I ran the ant target. It turned out that ant
was calling the wrong, or probably right, jvm. I found out by running with verbose and
debug flags on, after a lot of staring.
I allready did at the tenth. Actually you reply that it worked. That's how i found out
it was a jdk version thing. but i cannot think of any new jdk feature that is used in
this (or jdk bug fix). The sample was called type.zip. I'll post it again, if needed.
I can't lookup the archive message id
I am stuck to jdk 1.3.1 due to another library (LuciadMap) with swing problems, so
please is anyone has the vaguest of clues
-Original Message-
From: Hoogland Daan
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:35 PM
To: Castor Dev (E-mail)
Subject: xsi:type and jdk 1.3x
Does anyone know why unm
Does anyone know why unmarshalling an abstract type by means of xsi:type doesn't work
in jdk 1.3, while it does in .4? Or is this maybe fixed by now?
where to look...
thanks
---
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[
Yes if you send in your schema, or some other that shows the problem.
> -Original Message-
> From: Arati [mailto:arati_rahalkar@;persistent.co.in]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 4:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [castor-dev] Bug in generating XML Schema using
> XMLInstance2Sche
H,
Some people got the code by mail, but there is a patched version of castor 0.9.3.21 in
ftp://ftp.snow.nl/pub/castor. It is alpha still, work is on hold at the moment, but
given some stimulous I will continue some day soon. Note that it is my plan to either
integrated it with castor on the mi
Two cent:
I think that, starting the development of an application, using xml data, you start by
making example xml instances at first. So the XMLInstance2Schema is not just useful
when you get a schema, but actually a help at designing one. Not that I talk of
experience, I followed this path b
here's a curious cat.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:Erik.Ostermueller@;alltel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 4:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [castor-dev] SourceGenerator on multiple namespaces
>
>
>
> Vincent wrote:
> >> I also agree w
btw. the real live genericOperation is three inheritance levels down from operation,
and as the name suggests is not the end of the line.
operation <- rasterOperation <- leveledOperation <- genericOperation
They are all in one package but derivates may not be.
And also they are in the operation
Good night and good morning, be sure to get your eight hours.
now for my isolated test case
the output:
bash-2.05a$ java -cp classes test.test && java -cp classes test.test dsgf segf
avmaria: 0 arguments
avmaria: 2 arguments
org.xml.sax.SAXException: unable to find FieldDescriptor for 'item' i
Wow, this is five layers deep in a structure containing other things. I don't actually
call anything on these objects.
Can the generated objects be made to use that unmarshaller if i construct one like you
describe?
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith Visco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> S
On the object.
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith Visco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [castor-dev] xsi:type not unmarshaled proper
>
>
>
>
> Daan,
>
> How are you calling the Unmarshaller, this will help
I have a +- 4 weeks old cvs version in here.
This helps. now i am getting a class not found exception. Both with the way you
describe and with the full path name. And the other side of it is that it does not
marshal it in that way.
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud Blandin [mailto:[EM
If it is possible to create a mapping file from a class-file, Would it not be an equal
amount of work to create the source for a Descriptor class for it?
---
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with
You should define a subset of schema I think. The smallest one that is
usefull to your users. If it contains only structures supported by castor,
then why not. But if you then want to generate code for it the subset
gets a little smaller.
btw, it looks like your doing something people would ve
I take it you mean the has method. I'd rather work
independent of wether descriptors are available, as much as
possible. That means at generation time. The case of an optional
string works fine by the way, I can just check for null, maybe
it is a date issue.
I'll try to isolate the problem la
> From: Bruce Snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 5:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [castor-dev] toString() methods
>
>
> This one time, at band camp, Keith Visco said:
>
> KV>Perhaps, an optional configuration to generate a
> toXMLString() method.
> By the way, Mr. Hoogland: very cool email address! ;)
borrowed richness;)
---
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
toXML() or xmlString() I'd say, but I like it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith Visco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:32 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [castor-dev] toString() methods
>
>
>
> Perhaps, an optional configuration to generate a
tai,
Does it make sense to have objects have a toString method that returns
the xml representation of this object. Without the . I've been
longing for it a couple of times now.
---
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail
H Wei,
I share your expectation on the behaviour of your example. I know that the
SchemaInstance type type has been an issue on the list a while ago. I'm not sure on
the outcome. Have a look at the (2) archives. I avoided the use of xsi:type so far.
> Although I can not see how this informatio
Arnoud,
I read yet another set of questions on this subject on
the list so I am going public again.
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud Blandin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 4:47 PM
...
> I understand you are interested for the moment in the namespace issue
H,
I wrote an ugly workaround for the problem mentioned, but I ran into
the next one. So I'm not sure if it is what is needed.
(The diff as attachment is reversed. I got thrown out of the lab before
I could make a proper one)
here is the next one:
[javac] Compiling 116 source files to /h
28 matches
Mail list logo
