Re: [castor-dev] Article about Castor-JDO

2003-02-18 Thread Hugh Winkler
I think the silence speaks for itself. I don't think JDO is actively being maintained? Correct me if I am wrong here somebody. Anyway it has severe basic bugs that are not being worked on. I don't want at all to disparage the Castor team's work. The XML work is great. Looks like that's where thei

[castor-dev] JDO (0.9.4.2) problems with inheriance; our workaround

2003-02-02 Thread Hugh Winkler
, if that cannot be done performantly, Castor might, as we do, maintain a table of object instance identities vs. java class, but that may violate some nonfunctional requirement. In any case it's important that applications be able to write code like this without runtime exceptions.

[castor-dev] Patch: 0.9.4.2 builder generates erroneous xmlName

2003-02-01 Thread Hugh Winkler
This patch fixes bug: Castor 0.9.4.2 builder generates erroneous xmlName for top level attributes referenced by an element. I just lifted this code from similar code in ElementDecl.java. Please see attached testcase. Hugh Winkler BetweenMarkets Inc. --- castor-0.9.4.2/src/main/org/exolab

[castor-dev] Namespaced attributes/ 0.9.4

2001-10-11 Thread Hugh Winkler
appreciate. Looks like you're evolving the code to do this. Thanks Hugh Winkler hwinkler at betweenmarkets.com _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp