Re: [castor-dev] GeneralizedFieldHandler and Collections

2004-01-28 Thread Keith Visco
Hi Jeremy, Since it's part of the introspector, normally it shouldn't matter whether it's unmarshalling or marshaller. Try it with a non-date type. Date handling in Castor has some special test cases which might be getting in the way, in which case I'll need to obviously place priority on a user-

Re: [castor-dev] GeneralizedFieldHandler and Collections

2004-01-28 Thread Jeremy Haile
Keith, Should the FieldHandlerFactory method also work for the Marshaller? When I test it, the only method that gets called on my FieldHandlerFactory is getSupportedTypes. Currently my getSupportedTypes is just: public Class[] getSupportedTypes() { System.out.println( "getSupportedT

Re: [castor-dev] GeneralizedFieldHandler and Collections

2004-01-28 Thread Keith Visco
Hi Jeremy, I recall the discussion, though the problem obviously still exists if you are running into it. You might want to file a bug on that (http://bugzilla.exolab.org). There is an "undocumented" workaround for anyone using the CVS version, it's the ability to set a GeneralizedFieldHandler f

[castor-dev] GeneralizedFieldHandler and Collections

2004-01-28 Thread Jeremy Haile
I'm new to the list, so I hope I'm not rehashing a question that has been discussed recently. I looked in the mail archives and only found posts up to March of last year discussing using GeneralizedFieldHandler with Collections. It seems that the strange behavior when using a GeneralizedFieldHand