Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 12:04 PM, zooko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 5/ ideally, they should be one and only one version of a given package
>>> in an OS-based installation
>> -1 -- This is the strong preference of the folks who package software for
>> OSes -- Debian, Fedora, e
Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'll also note that the require in setuptools-generated scripts causes
> pretty frequent problems for people, all to support this multi-version
> feature that no one really uses.
I agree heartily that it seems to cause more trouble than it's worth —
for m
Ben Finney wrote:
Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'll also note that the require in setuptools-generated scripts causes
pretty frequent problems for people, all to support this multi-version
feature that no one really uses.
I agree heartily that it seems to cause more trouble than it
At 02:58 PM 10/7/2008 -0400, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:07 AM 10/7/2008 -0400, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>>
>> The -m feature of setuptools is nice, but it activates one version at
>> a time, and
>> this is globlal to Python unles
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 10:07 AM 10/7/2008 -0400, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
The -m feature of setuptools is nice, but it activates one version at
a time, and
this is globlal to Python unless each application is handling the
versio
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:07 AM 10/7/2008 -0400, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>>
>> The -m feature of setuptools is nice, but it activates one version at
>> a time, and
>> this is globlal to Python unless each application is handling the
>> version swit
At 10:07 AM 10/7/2008 -0400, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
The -m feature of setuptools is nice, but it activates one version at
a time, and
this is globlal to Python unless each application is handling the
version switch,
wich is pretty heavy.
With or without the -m switch, scripts installed by setuptool
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Fred Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Tarek Ziadé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We are going to have a P4-sprint (pre-pre-pre-PEP sprint) in D.C.
>> during the Plone Conference.
>
> Very cool.
>
> Given the venue, should people exp
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Tarek Ziadé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are going to have a P4-sprint (pre-pre-pre-PEP sprint) in D.C.
> during the Plone Conference.
Very cool.
Given the venue, should people expect that they're welcome in person
even if not associated with the Plone conferen
Hey all,
We are going to have a P4-sprint (pre-pre-pre-PEP sprint) in D.C.
during the Plone Conference.
The idea is to try to bring the discussions that have been going on in
the mailing lists into the next stage.
Please join us if you are interested, even if you are not in D.C.
http://www.open
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 12:04 PM, zooko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 5/ ideally, they should be one and only one version of a given package
>> in an OS-based installation
>
> -1 -- This is the strong preference of the folks who package software for
> OSes -- Debian, Fedora, etc. -- but it is not ne
11 matches
Mail list logo
